Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Receivers Rotation

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2011, 11:19 AM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:22 PM   #2
mlmpetert
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

Im gonna switch out Banks with Stallworth and drop Hankerson down a notch. A injured Banks doesnt play special teams either. Unless Banks plays and doesnt swell up after the game next week i think he starts the year on the PUP list
__________________
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:51 PM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlmpetert View Post
Im gonna switch out Banks with Stallworth and drop Hankerson down a notch. A injured Banks doesnt play special teams either. Unless Banks plays and doesnt swell up after the game next week i think he starts the year on the PUP list
He can't start on PUP. He would have needed to be on there at the start of camp.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 01:13 PM   #4
mlmpetert
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
He can't start on PUP. He would have needed to be on there at the start of camp.

Damn, I didnt realize.

I dint think Stallworth would do anything when we signed him but hes really impressed me. Stallworth is a guy who could be the number 3 reciever on the team and Banks cant be in my eyes. If theres ever a injury or suspension issue at WR i think Stallworth would be better suited to step in and contribute then Banks.

I agree that Banks is at least a solid notch above Austin in his return skills, particularly in his KO returns. I guess it all comes down to coaches thinking that hell be healthy enough to play each week...
__________________
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:28 PM   #5
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,751
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)

How do you still have Banks on that list seeing as how the KR/PR have been just as effective without him in there? I think there is too much potential on Paul to let go (not that he's shown us much yet) as compared to a 1 trick pony who's talents we've shown have been replaced in his absence.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:49 PM   #6
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
How do you still have Banks on that list seeing as how the KR/PR have been just as effective without him in there? I think there is too much potential on Paul to let go (not that he's shown us much yet) as compared to a 1 trick pony who's talents we've shown have been replaced in his absence.
If Banks is healthy he's too valuable in the return game. Austin is a nice backup as a returner, but Banks is still the big play guy. Austin doesn't match him in that regard.

Paul hasn't shown us much in the passing game. John Keim has remarked that his route running at this point is still really a work in progress.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:52 PM   #7
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul to the PS. Stallworth gets the axe (he doesn't play teams)
This makes the most sense at this point assuming Banks is healthy
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2011, 12:58 PM   #8
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Paul
Banks- If healthy, keep him as a return specialist, carry 2 QB's to create a position for him. If not healthy and it would not surprise me if he is put on IR for the year.

I would love to keep all 7.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.32910 seconds with 11 queries