Around the NFL week 1

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Jamaican'Skin

So a Redskin's win, a Giants and Cowboys loss and we're the only team that's 1-0 vs the division? #euphoria

Sadly the Rams couldn't put the upset, so the Iggles are 1-0. Although, I'm still predicting Vick getting injured, b/c their o-line sucks.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Sadly the Rams couldn't put the upset, so the Iggles are 1-0. Although, I'm still predicting Vick getting injured, b/c their o-line sucks.

Well, the Eagles didn't beat a division opponent today. Which I think was his point

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Well, the Eagles didn't beat a division opponent today. Which I think was his point

Ah, I thought he was talking about overall record. So we are at top of the NFC East. Yay.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Sadly the Rams couldn't put the upset, so the Iggles are 1-0. Although, I'm still predicting Vick getting injured, b/c their o-line sucks.

What I liked today was how Vick wasn't invincible. Under 50% passing, 1 lost fumble, 5.8 ypa, and sub 200 yards through the air. A better defense can stop that or at least contain it. Granted he still had a great game when you factor in 98 rushing yards on 10 carries (I mean yards are yards) but he's not doing it with the same type of efficiency that he was in 2010.

Don't get me wrong, Vick is still dangerous but if today was any indication we're not dealing with the same guy that destroyed everyone via both passing and running. In short he's still a better QB then he was in Atlanta, but if we're lucky he won't be the same guy we saw last year.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

What I liked today was how Vick wasn't invincible. Under 50% passing, 1 lost fumble, 5.8 ypa, and sub 200 yards through the air. A better defense can stop that or at least contain it. Granted he still had a great game when you factor in 98 rushing yards on 10 carries (I mean yards are yards) but he's not doing it with the same type of efficiency that he was in 2010.

Don't get me wrong, Vick is still dangerous but if today was any indication we're not dealing with the same guy that destroyed everyone via both passing and running. In short he's still a better QB then he was in Atlanta, but if we're lucky he won't be the same guy we saw last year.

I'll be curious to see how we're going to attack Vick. We've GOT to take advantage of those three rookies on their o-line.

[Swarley]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

What I liked today was how Vick wasn't invincible. Under 50% passing, 1 lost fumble, 5.8 ypa, and sub 200 yards through the air. A better defense can stop that or at least contain it. Granted he still had a great game when you factor in 98 rushing yards on 10 carries (I mean yards are yards) but he's not doing it with the same type of efficiency that he was in 2010.

Don't get me wrong, Vick is still dangerous but if today was any indication we're not dealing with the same guy that destroyed everyone via both passing and running. In short he's still a better QB then he was in Atlanta, but if we're lucky he won't be the same guy we saw last year.

He threw into double coverage more times than I'm sure Andy Reid would have like to see. I really think the key to beating Vick is to make him pay with turnovers. As long as you stay patient with him, he's ripe for the picking imo.