Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Start John Beck Madness Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2011, 06:41 PM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Shame that we're 3-1 sitting here banging our heads against the wall over the starting QB... as usual.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 06:49 PM   #2
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Shame that we're 3-1 sitting here banging our heads against the wall over the starting QB... as usual.
Seriously.

Has anybody thought about what happens if Beck is not the answer? I look at Grossman like this:

He makes some good plays (such as Moss' touchdown on 4th down against Arizona), and he makes some bad plays (such as boneheaded interceptions).

Now I look at Beck like this:

He's sat on the bench except for his whole horrible career in Miami. Could he provide better play? Possibly. Could he be just as bad, if not worse? Possibly.

Back to my starting point. If Beck is actually worse than Grossman, then what? Do we put Grossman back in? And then bench him again when he sucks? Do we flip flop all season between two qb's best suited to be backups? If Beck was tearing it up in practice and Grossman kept looking like shit, I don't think Shanahan would hesitate to replace Grossman. But so far Grossman has provided us with good and bad highlights, and he's also 3-1 as a starter.

The time to replace Grossman is when his negatives clearly outweigh his positives. Sorry guys but we're not there yet. And does it matter anyways? Both are over 30, neither are the long term solution, and our starting qb next season is probably playing in the NCAA right now.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 06:52 PM   #3
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post

The time to replace Grossman is when his negatives clearly outweigh his positives.
Sorry guys but we're not there yet. And does it matter anyways? Both are over 30, neither are the long term solution, and our starting qb next season is probably playing in the NCAA right now.
He turns it over way too much. 14 turnovers in his last 7 starts. That's bad. Really bad.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 06:56 PM   #4
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
He turns it over way too much. 14 turnovers in his last 7 starts. That's bad. Really bad.
Yeah but that's one side of the equation. Grossman has also made plays that have contributed to the games we've won. How do we know Beck is capable of making those plays? All Beck has so far in his career is negative plays, and he didn't exactly booster Shanny's confidence in him by tearing it up during the preseason either.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 06:58 PM   #5
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Yeah but that's one side of the equation. Grossman has also made plays that have contributed to the games we've won. How do we know Beck is capable of making those plays? All Beck has so far in his career is negative plays, and he didn't exactly booster Shanny's confidence in him by tearing it up during the preseason either.
I guess what I'm saying is I'm not an advocate for either QB. Since we have to have one of them under center, I still lean towards Rex... for now.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:04 PM   #6
fanarchist
Special Teams
 
fanarchist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Yeah but that's one side of the equation. Grossman has also made plays that have contributed to the games we've won. How do we know Beck is capable of making those plays? All Beck has so far in his career is negative plays, and he didn't exactly booster Shanny's confidence in him by tearing it up during the preseason either.
How do we know Beck isn't capable of making those plays, more plays, or better decisions if we never give him the opportunity to prove himself in a live game format with consequences.

I understand why the people here want to ride Grossman until the wheels fall off. It's the same conservative football mentality that has permeated this franchise and its fan base for the past decade. They're the same people who are complaining that we should run the ball more when we're 6th in the NFL in rushing attempts.

As the saying goes "fortune favors the bold", not fortune favors the prudent.

Last edited by fanarchist; 10-03-2011 at 08:07 PM.
fanarchist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 06:49 PM   #7
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Shame that we're 3-1 sitting here banging our heads against the wall over the starting QB... as usual.
Can't have QB ratings around 50 for 2 straight weeks. I hate that Rex Grossman is our starting QB, but at 3-1 you kind of have to stand pat.

Given the praise that Beck has gotten from the Shannys, I don't imagine that Rex can have too many more games like that and keep his job. Problem is, what if you bench him and Beck comes in and stinks up the place? Season goes totally down the toilet at that point.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 07:13 PM   #8
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Shame that we're 3-1 sitting here banging our heads against the wall over the starting QB... as usual.
When you lose to a beat up lame ass Cowboys team and barely beat the crapless Rams, their is legitimate grounds for concern. Unless of course one is short sighted. 3-1 yes, convincingly no.

The team is playing great. Grossman, not so great so far. I don't see a problem with anyone wanting Beck at this time.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 07:22 PM   #9
zeesson
Camp Scrub
 
zeesson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 42
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44ever View Post
When you lose to a beat up lame ass Cowboys team and barely beat the crapless Rams, their is legitimate grounds for concern. Unless of course one is short sighted. 3-1 yes, convincingly no.

The team is playing great. Grossman, not so great so far. I don't see a problem with anyone wanting Beck at this time.

Honestly even though I thought Beck played better in the preseason, I can still see the other side's point. We know what we will get from Rex; we have no idea what we will get from Beck. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
zeesson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 08:02 AM   #10
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44ever View Post
When you lose to a beat up lame ass Cowboys team and barely beat the crapless Rams, their is legitimate grounds for concern. Unless of course one is short sighted. 3-1 yes, convincingly no.

The team is playing great. Grossman, not so great so far. I don't see a problem with anyone wanting Beck at this time.
Who cares about convincingly?! Style points only count in college football.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 08:55 AM   #11
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
Who cares about convincingly?! Style points only count in college football.
Well if you look at his performance against Dallas, had he converted just 1 time in the RZ we would have won that game. Any average starting QB in the league given the same opportunity would have at least converted 1 in such a important game. It's a shame because everyone else around him played pretty decent, the D played more than decent holding Romo to zero. What more can a QB ask for?

Further, nobody is crying for a QB change, I don't see that at all. Most that are for Beck are content on allowing Rex to continue but would not object to seeing Beck. We are also hoping Rex has a great season.

Honestly, if Rex goes down and Beck is brought in and plays solid, I would bet those of you who are "Rex or nothing" would not want him back when healthy.

It's really a wait and see for me as I am good either way.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 09:20 AM   #12
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44ever View Post
Well if you look at his performance against Dallas, had he converted just 1 time in the RZ we would have won that game. Any average starting QB in the league given the same opportunity would have at least converted 1 in such a important game. It's a shame because everyone else around him played pretty decent, the D played more than decent holding Romo to zero. What more can a QB ask for?

Further, nobody is crying for a QB change, I don't see that at all. Most that are for Beck are content on allowing Rex to continue but would not object to seeing Beck. We are also hoping Rex has a great season.

Honestly, if Rex goes down and Beck is brought in and plays solid, I would bet those of you who are "Rex or nothing" would not want him back when healthy.

It's really a wait and see for me as I am good either way.
Do we actually have this? I believe the "Rex" people are more the...."as long as we're winning" people (as in don't rock the boat). Myself included. IF he should crash....injured.......contract diptheria, and JB comes in and plays well? I think we will all become once again "as long as we're winning" for Beck fans.
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 09:08 PM   #13
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Shame that we're 3-1 sitting here banging our heads against the wall over the starting QB... as usual.

I'm stoked! 3-1 can't complain.. I just said if they do go w Beck why not? He's prob as good as rex anyway
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 08:53 AM   #14
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,592
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Shame that we're 3-1 sitting here banging our heads against the wall over the starting QB... as usual.
Well I think most fans are happy that we're 3-1. But I also think most fans realize that we barely beat a really bad football team. And the reason was cause of the offense. The Rams flat out dropped a pick six. Going to need more out of the QB position in order to beat better teams.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 06:17 PM   #15
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Shame that we're 3-1 sitting here banging our heads against the wall over the starting QB... as usual.
Nah...not upset or banging my head....but we should be 4-0.
We lost to a team that could only score field goals against our D.
Rex is like watching a bi-polar train wreck full of turnovers.
Against the Rams, one of the worst teams in the NFL, Rex started good but then slowed down as the game went on and played down to their level. Ugly!
He is so slow to set up on the play action pass. His speed from center, to the fake to the RB with his back to the defense, then turn and throw is molasses-like. His naked bootlegs and rollouts are amateurish at times. Both of the Shanahan's faces during these moments is telling.
Rex was not that much better than Beck in preseason. Beck looked better in certain games. It is not that crazy of an idea to see Beck play if Rex does not improve in the turnovers and red zone.

Last edited by Defensewins; 10-04-2011 at 06:22 PM.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31561 seconds with 11 queries