Carolina Panthers vs Washington Redskins Gameday Thread

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by DynamiteRave

You seem to be under the delusion that I think TO is the second coming of Jesus. But if you'd like to twist things around like that, that's fine. All I said was TO could be a short term (read SHORT TERM) band-aid and Hankerson isn't going to be anything special from what I've seen from him in college and in the pre-season.

I never assumed that you thought these things. My points are based on T.O having a modest season. 600 yards, 3 Tds AT BEST, and likely less.
I'm arguing that the short-term should not be sacrificed in favor of the long term gains. The big question that should be addressed is simple: What do we gain wins/losses-wise picking up T.O? And I'd answer, not enough to justify the move(maybe 2 or 3 at best). I'd rather cut Hankerson for some impressive (to the coaches) practice squader over T.O. And I would be ALL ON BOARD for that move as well. Yes, replacing Hank for some PS'er. No sarcasm. Why? Because it's following the same principle: hunting for long-term assests.

With Gaffney, Austin, and Paul, a guy from the practice squad who's had 6 weeks to study the playbook and still run around like a chicken with his head cut off it doesn't look very promising. The odds are against Hankerson is what I've been getting at. I get that everything is a risk, some guys actually show promise. To me seeing his college tape and his pre-season tape, Hankerson doesn't.

And I state 5%. FIVE ****ING PERCENT and THREE-THOUSANDTHS of a percent of being a superstar AND YOU'RE ASSUMING I'M IN LOVE WITH THE DUDE AND DESTINED FOR SUCCESS.

But if you wanna fill the team in your head with a bunch of what-if's, go right ahead. This argument is ridiculous because apparently I wanna take TO and make him play for 5+ years and think he's never/hasn't dropped off. Silly me.

I never assumed that you thought these things. My points are based on T.O having a modest season. Anywhere between 400-600 yards, 3 Tds, give or take.

But for the sake of you being right and the Skins getting better, I hope Hankerson ends up the second coming of Jerry Rice.

Wait, a guy I stated that I think has .03% chance of becoming a superstar is someone I have a mancrush on? 3 thousdanths of a percent is not that high at all.

You'll probably keep on assuming those same things about me no matter how many times I try to clarify it. That's one assumption I'll actually make from your posting history.

[DynamiteRave]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

I never assumed that you thought these things. My points are based on T.O having a modest season. 600 yards, 3 Tds AT BEST, and likely less.
I'm arguing that the short-term should not be sacrificed in favor of the long term gains. The big question that should be addressed is simple: What do we gain wins/losses-wise picking up T.O? And I'd answer, not enough to justify the move(maybe 2 or 3 at best). I'd rather cut Hankerson for some impressive (to the coaches) practice squader over T.O. And I would be ALL ON BOARD for that move as well. Yes, replacing Hank for some PS'er. No sarcasm. Why? Because it's following the same principle: hunting for long-term assests.

And I state 5%. FIVE ****ING PERCENT and THREE-THOUSANDTHS of a percent of being a superstar AND YOU'RE ASSUMING I'M IN LOVE WITH THE DUDE AND DESTINED FOR SUCCESS.

I never assumed that you thought these things. My points are based on T.O having a modest season. Anywhere between 400-600 yards, 3 Tds, give or take.


Wait, a guy I stated that I think has .03% chance of becoming a superstar is someone I have a mancrush on? 3 thousdanths of a percent is not that high at all.

You'll probably keep on assuming those same things about me no matter how many times I try to clarify it. That's one assumption I'll actually make from your posting history.

Probably.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by DynamiteRave

Probably.

THAT'S Humor......

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by DynamiteRave

Probably.

Not a lot of things piss me off, but being falsely accused is one of them. That you would prefer your little assumptions about me to whatever I communicate about my actual feelings on the matter(far more netural than you think. T.O is to us as Roman Hamrlik was to Montreal) shows me that you justice and fairness sure as hell isn't on your moral compass. Throughtout the whole converstaion, I was going by T.O providing 400-600 yards or less and trying to prove that was worthless for us. I don't need to draw up a strawman of T.O being a perennial pro-bowler. But you won't see that and instead attribute to me that I'm a Hankerson fanboy. Well, **** off.

I hope Hankerson ****ing fails so I can prove you wrong. **** you. **** Leonard Hankerson. **** T.O.

[DynamiteRave]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

Not a lot of things piss me off, but being falsely accused is one of them. That you would prefer your little assumptions about me to whatever I communicate about my actual feelings on the matter(far more netural than you think. T.O is to us as Roman Hamrlik was to Montreal) shows me that you justice and fairness sure as hell isn't on your moral compass. Throughtout the whole converstaion, I was going by T.O providing 400-600 yards or less and trying to prove that was worthless for us. I don't need to draw up a strawman of T.O being a perennial pro-bowler. But you won't see that and instead attribute to me that I'm a Hankerson fanboy. Well, **** off.

I hope Hankerson ****ing fails so I can prove you wrong. **** you. **** Leonard Hankerson. **** T.O.

Geez, take a Valium. It's not that serious.