A Look Back at the 2008 RB Class

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

That would have been the fan reaction if we actually did draft a RB then. I'm just sayin'.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

That would have been the fan reaction if we actually did draft a RB then. I'm just sayin'.

well maybe some, not here for sure

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

well maybe some, not here for sure

We're only a small segment of the thousands or millions of Redskins fans throughout the nation. I doubt most are hardcore analysts like folks here and on other message boards.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

We're only a small segment of the thousands or millions of Redskins fans throughout the nation. I doubt most are hardcore analysts like folks here and on other message boards.

regardless, like you said we didnt need a RB we had Tortis. Hell we didnt need betts or rock, just him on the roster was fine.

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

regardless, like you said we didnt need a RB we had Tortis. Hell we didnt need betts or rock, just him on the roster was fine.

If you didn't get the message of the blatant sarcasm behind my initial post of "But we had Clinton Portis", you are helpless. Nor does your second statement make any sense since I never implied it., The rationale I am mocking that most fans operate under "starters are filled, thus depth can be filled by anyone", NOT "we got a starter, depth is unnecessary". Just like I was the one who posted a thread about the WaPo article about Snyder hunting for Shanahan, I was one of the critics of Clinton Portis on this board.