Positions Which Need to Be Addressed

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Well, agree to disagree on Luck then.

As far as Landry Jones vs RG3... RG3 padded his stats early against the Rice's and Stephen F. Austins of the world. He hasn't been great the past 3 weeks with only 5tds and 4ints. Landry Jones has been torching it lately with 10 tds in the past two games against quality opponents like K-State and Texas Tech. I'm no QB expert, I just like Barkley and Jones better as pro-prospects than I do RG3. I never said I didn't like RG3 btw.

Anyway, I'm not a pro scout so it doesn't really matter, and I'm also not really in the mood to get into a RG3 argument for the sake of satisfying your man-crush on him.

I'm not sure if we're going to win another game this year. Based on the way the Miami played the Giants yesterday I'm sure they will pull out some wins. Andrew Luck is not off the table yet.

I know you're not qb expert. You didn't dispute not one thing I've said. If you did try it would be baseless. RG3 is a more accurate passer than Landry Jones. He has way more moblity than Landry Jones. Who can dispute that?

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Landry44

I'm not sure if we're going to win another game this year. Based on the way the Miami played the Giants yesterday I'm sure they will pull out some wins. Andrew Luck is not off the table yet.

I know you're not qb expert. You didn't dispute not one thing I've said. If you did try it would be baseless. RG3 is a more accurate passer than Landry Jones. He has way more moblity than Landry Jones. Who can dispute that?

And I know you're not either. You throw out absolutisms based on a stat sheet. It's boring. And tiring.

[IrMitchell]

The BIGGEST problem is easily the corners. Easily.

Other than that, we need more size in the middle of our line, they seem to get out muscled way too easily.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by IrMitchell

The BIGGEST problem is easily the corners. Easily.

Other than that, we need more size in the middle of our line, they seem to get out muscled way too easily.

QB first, CB second, then the OL. This team needs a Brandon Flowers type CB, someone who can play not pretend to play.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by IrMitchell

The BIGGEST problem is easily the corners. Easily.

Other than that, we need more size in the middle of our line, they seem to get out muscled way too easily.

Really? We have a terrible offense, but this is the biggest problem? I really hope ur being sarcastic.

[Alvin Walton]

Originally Posted by IrMitchell

The BIGGEST problem is easily the corners. Easily.

Other than that, we need more size in the middle of our line, they seem to get out muscled way too easily.

We get shut out and you blame it on the corners?

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by GMScud

And I know you're not either. You throw out absolutisms based on a stat sheet. It's boring. And tiring.

It's obvious that I know a lot more about qbs than you do. The reason i say that RG3 is more accurate than Landry Jones and Matt Barkley is because of his great touch and ball placement. I'm not suggesting that Jones and Barkley are not accurate passers. They just are not as accurate as RG3. I actually watch college football. I know exactly what I'm talking about.

Here is an example.

Robert Griffin III vs TCU 2011 - YouTube

Matt Barkley vs ASU

Matt Barkley vs ASU 2011 - YouTube

Landry Jones

You Tube

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Landry44

It's obvious that I know a lot more about qbs than you do. The reason i say that RG3 is more accurate than Landry Jones and Matt Barkley is because of his great touch and ball placement. I'm not suggesting that Jones and Barkley are not accurate passers. They just are not as accurate as RG3. I actually watch college football. I know exactly what I'm talking about.

Here is an example.

Robert Griffin III vs TCU 2011 - YouTube

Matt Barkley vs ASU

Matt Barkley vs ASU 2011 - YouTube

Landry Jones

Matt Barkley vs ASU 2011 - YouTube

Lol. See my post in the 2012 draft class thread. You talk loud and say nothing.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Lol. See my post in the 2012 draft class thread. You talk loud and say nothing.

What exactly are you saying? You haven't made not one valid point. I'm showing what talking about. Is Landry Jones more accurate than RG3? Just say yes or no. Is he more mobile than RG3? Just say yes or no. If you don't disagree with me then what is your argument? If you do, I'll be more than happy to prove you wrong.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Landry44

What exactly are you saying? You haven't made not one valid point. I'm showing what talking about. Is Landry Jones more accurate than RG3? Just say yes or no. Is he more mobile than RG3? Just say yes or no. If you don't disagree with me then what is your argument? If you do, I'll be more than happy to prove you wrong.

So you're like a self-proclaimed college football watching qb guru, huh? RG3 has a better completion percentage, thanks in large part to an early season schedule of cupcakes. Like I said earlier, his last three games have been pretty underwhelming. And yes, he runs better than Jones. And like I said all along (and you agreed so I really don't see what your deal is) Jones is the better pro prospect. You're excruciating.

[SFREDSKIN]

If you had a choice of a Michael Vick type QB or a Tom Brady, who would you take? Brady of course. How many athletic type QB's have won a SB? I can only think of one, Steve Young. Give me a traditional type: Manning, Rothlisberger, Brady, Rogers.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If you had a choice of a Michael Vick type QB or a Tom Brady, who would you take? Brady of course. How many athletic type QB's have won a SB? I can only think of one, Steve Young. Give me a traditional type: Manning, Rothlisberger, Brady, Rogers.

Do you even watch college football? Because it's obvious you don't if you look at RG3 as a Michael Vick type qb. He's one of the best passers in this draft. Go look at his games instead of his skin color, because that's the only thing he got in common with Vick.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Landry44

Do you even watch college football? Because it's obvious you don't if you look at RG3 as a Michael Vick type qb. He's one of the best passers in this draft. Go look at his games instead of his skin color, because that's the only thing he got in common with Vick.

Have you seen Barkley play? He plays against Stanford, Oregon, Washington, Cal, etc. All big programs and has proven himself too. Race has nothing to do with this.

2012 NFL Draft Prospect Rankings: QB

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If you had a choice of a Michael Vick type QB or a Tom Brady, who would you take? Brady of course. How many athletic type QB's have won a SB? I can only think of one, Steve Young. Give me a traditional type: Manning, Rothlisberger, Brady, Rogers.

Roethlisberger is not a "traditional" QB.