Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Build the Redskins for 2012

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2011, 07:26 AM   #1
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Build the Redskins for 2012

I heard we weren't really interested in Barkley, but a) that might have been because we thought we couldn't get him and b) how could we not at least consider him
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 08:13 AM   #2
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Thumbs up Re: Build the Redskins for 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I heard we weren't really interested in Barkley, but a) that might have been because we thought we couldn't get him and b) how could we not at least consider him
Interesting... I guess that means there is no consideration for Andrew Luck, then.
mbedner3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 10:51 AM   #3
IrMitchell
Impact Rookie
 
IrMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 657
Re: Build the Redskins for 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I heard we weren't really interested in Barkley, but a) that might have been because we thought we couldn't get him and b) how could we not at least consider him
Ugh... You already have inside information about whether we like Matt Barkley?
__________________
One of Canada's two Redskins fans.
IrMitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 11:00 AM   #4
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Build the Redskins for 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by IrMitchell View Post
Ugh... You already have inside information about whether we like Matt Barkley?
Just rumors I've heard. Thing is the team can't really do much scouting on him anyway at this point since he's not a senior.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 03:14 PM   #5
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 14,750
Re: Build the Redskins for 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I heard we weren't really interested in Barkley, but a) that might have been because we thought we couldn't get him and b) how could we not at least consider him
I'm hearing from my sources that he has a long release as well as a low one which doesn't really bode well for a QB that's already considered short.

Right now I would first see how viable trading up for Luck is, hope that the Colts are willing to deal and make an Eli Manning like trade. Plan B would be to look at Tannehill and Moore.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 03:57 PM   #6
skinster
Impact Rookie
 
skinster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
Re: Build the Redskins for 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag59 View Post
I'm hearing from my sources that he has a long release as well as a low one which doesn't really bode well for a QB that's already considered short.

Right now I would first see how viable trading up for Luck is, hope that the Colts are willing to deal and make an Eli Manning like trade. Plan B would be to look at Tannehill and Moore.
I hate to say it but we'd never do that. As much as I would love it to be good in like 5 years, Shanahan doesn't seem to have any patience or care about care about re-building at all. If I remember right the Manning trade was two firsts, a second, a third, and a fifth. I just can't see a man like Mike, who is trying to win now, and seems to have the philosophy of quantity over quality (defer to last two drafts), give up that many picks. He wants alot of players and he wants them now.

Personally I would love the move, but I think if we do it we''d have to wait a good 5 years before being competitive. We already lack young talent on our team, and to give up so many picks would further that void. Yeah luck is good, but no infant qb in the league can peyton manning his team to the playoffs consistently. He's going to need time to develop or pieces around him now to win.

Also I think the colts would be crazy to draft anybody but luck.
skinster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.87419 seconds with 11 queries