Lots of RBs, DBs, LBs, but why no DT or DE?

Daseal · 05-31-2005, 06:46 PM

Maybe this is me speaking... but from what I've seen Greg William's doesn't rely on a bigtime DE to get sacks. We blitz a lot of the time. Our defensive line has 2-3 great ends to play the run. We have enough power inside to push the pocket a little bit and stop the run. I think that's their job and they do it just fine.

We're going to bring a lot of outside pressure. As long as our Dline can occupy their O line, they are doing their job.

05-31-2005, 06:46 PM	#5
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 8,341	Re: Lots of RBs, DBs, LBs, but why no DT or DE? Maybe this is me speaking... but from what I've seen Greg William's doesn't rely on a bigtime DE to get sacks. We blitz a lot of the time. Our defensive line has 2-3 great ends to play the run. We have enough power inside to push the pocket a little bit and stop the run. I think that's their job and they do it just fine. We're going to bring a lot of outside pressure. As long as our Dline can occupy their O line, they are doing their job. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Lots of RBs, DBs, LBs, but why no DT or DE?

Locker Room Main Forum