![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
Bottom line, the Niners were the team of the 80's, winning Super Bowls in '81, '84, '88, and '89. The Skins were arguably the 2nd best team of the decade with Super Bowl wins in '82 and '87, a Super Bowl loss in '83, and an NFC Championship Game loss in '86. You can't be considered a dynasty if you weren't even the best team of the era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,592
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
During the 1980s, the 49ers and Dolphins won more games, but the 49ers won more Super Bowls. The Redskins won the second most Super Bowls.
Last edited by REDSKINS4ever; 12-19-2011 at 12:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
I guess the long and short of it is, I'm fine with the Redskins being considered second best during the 1980's, because if you're second best back then, you're still considered a very elite team.
And, I guess the best way to have our team considered a dynasty is to keep building the current team, and have them go out and win those Super Bowls!
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
So did the Raiders 1980 and 1983.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
I forgot about the Raiders. The Raiders won Superbowls 15 and 18. But their winning percentage during the 1980s was less than that of the Redskins and 49ers. That's the reason why it is very easy to forget that they won 2 Super Bowls in the 80s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
Winning more games does not mean much when you are in a weak ass division like the Niners and Dolphins. The NFC east back in the 80's and 90's was a beast. Washington, Dallas and Giants won multiple SB's. Not sure you can say that for any other division.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
Of course remember the divisions were much different back in the 1980's. The Western division had the Rams, Saints, 49ers, and Falcons. Still nothing compared to the Eastern division back then.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
During those days, the NFC East was the toughest division in football. I would have to say that the AFC West was a close second, with the Denver Broncos and Oakland Raiders combining for five Super Bowl appearances in the 1980s. Also, the Seattle Seahaws and San Diego Chargers, both AFC West teams, both made it to the AFC Championship game in the early 1980s. But they couldn't outgun the teams in the NFC East though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: The Redskins of the 1980's: Dynasty?
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|