![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
Could he have meant Kyle landing a head coaching job somewhere else? That might be a blessing in disguise for the new QB coming in. (Assuming of course there is one....)
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
I would be shocked to see that happen.......
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsistent defense
Quote:
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsistent defense
Quote:
Thank goodness someone sees what I have been preaching for quite a while. Teams that are successful have continuity on both sides of the ball. He has our D from 31st to 13th, top 5 in several key areas (3rd downs, sacks) I am looking for a much bigger improvement next year after another draft and off season. Plus Jarvis will be back, Cofield and Bowen another off season to learn more of the 3-4. Riley playing from the beginning of the season. I really think we are in a position to be a top notch defense if we stay the course. And honestly, a contender for the division next season if we keep building and adding pieces to this offense. Hell, with Rex were putting up 20+ a game the last month 1/2 and had games that we lost late. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 363
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
snatch up spags
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
SS,
He said that we should monitor what happens with washington's coaching staff, and that his gut says that shanahan stays, but he feels like one or both of the coordinators would have to change, defensively and or offensively. And yeah I say we give him another year--haslett.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
Quote:
If that happens where we get rid of or change coaching our coaching staff, I swear it is getting hard to root for an organization that continues to set itself up for failure year in and year out. Just when you think we are going in the right direction, getting some continuity, some familiarity with offensive and defensive schemes, they change it. No one has patience and no one can expect to win consistantly if you change every damn thing after two years. OUr defense is progressing from 31st to 13th in one season!!! Why do we need to change that. Our offense is finally moving the ball, averaging 22 points a game the last 5 weeks, with rookie RB's and make shift Oline and really not a #1 true WR and Rex at QB. I just dont freaking get it why we need to change all the time. We will never win if we keep changing the f'n coaches. so damn frustrating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
I think you definitely keep Haslett for one more year, but I have to say, if Spags is available, that would be awful tempting....
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
Spags is a 4-3 guy...we run a 3-4...ain't gonna work and the eagles are expected to get him.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
We're (still) best suited as a 4-3 in terms of personnel. And letting Spags go to the Iggles if we could land him would be unforgivable.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
What is so great about Spags?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Jim Haslett's inconsist defense
I think we need to keep Haslett. The defense is currently rated 13, last year we were ranked 31. That is a difference of 18 spots. We are only missing a few pieces from being a consistent top ten defense.
We need a true coverage corner. Landry set us back by not getting the surgery last offseason. The defense is different with him healthy.
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|