![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: If you are the 2nd-best athlete in the NFL, does it make it okay?
last year ST got burned a bit because even though he's class A physically, he hasn't put the time into film study and mental prep that he really needs to, and until he does he won't be the kind of game changer that manning, TO, reed etc are...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: If you are the 2nd-best athlete in the NFL, does it make it okay?
Quote:
Manning had a QB rating of 71.2 and 2 more INTs than TDs as a rookie. Taylor had 1 more turnover than Reed had as a rookie. Taylor might not be the quintessential game-changer yet, but neither were TO, Manning, or Reed as rookies. Give him time (that is, if a Judge doesn't give him time). |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|