RGIII declares for NFL draft

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Landry44

You're not sure about RG3's accuracy because you don't watch college football. RG3 is an outstanding passer with great accuracy. No one throws the deep ball with more accuracy than RG3. To say he's just an ok passer if flat out wrong. He's more than just an ok passer.

There you go again. Taking anything negative anyone says about RGIII personally, and reacting by assuming that anyone who doesn't love him must never watch any college football. Stop it dude. Your man crush on RGIII is exhausting.

[Counter-Tre]

Originally Posted by GMScud

There you go again. Taking anything negative anyone says about RGIII personally, and reacting by assuming that anyone who doesn't love him must never watch any college football. Stop it dude. Your man crush on RGIII is exhausting.

So you are not sold on this guy? What do you think the skins should do? I am not provoking you, I am genuinely baffled and have had the discussion with my fellow fans countless times and the opinions vary from trade up to get Luck if the Rams trump the Colts for worst record to signing Peyton Manning as a two year stop-gap.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by GMScud

There you go again. Taking anything negative anyone says about RGIII personally, and reacting by assuming that anyone who doesn't love him must never watch any college football. Stop it dude. Your man crush on RGIII is exhausting.

So do you agree or disagree with my assessment? Go right ahead and challenge me so I can make you look like buffoon once again.

[Dirtbag59]

Lets evaluate the QB's the way Shanahan will.
VS

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

Lets evaluate the QB's the way Shanahan will.
VS

You can't evaluate a guy based on his highlights.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by Landry44

You can't evaluate a guy based on his highlights.

You didn't get the joke? Theres a rumor that Shanahan likes to evaluate players based on highlights thinking that he can increase the frequency of any players best plays.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

You didn't get the joke? Theres a rumor that Shanahan likes to evaluate players based on highlights thinking that he can increase the frequency of any players best plays.

LOL! Please tell me that's a joke!

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Landry44

So do you agree or disagree with my assessment? Go right ahead and challenge me so I can make you look like buffoon once again.

Be careful. And I'm sorry your memory is failing you, but last time it was myself and CRedskinsRule that made you look extremely buffoon-ish. You got basically got punked and never responded.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Be careful. And I'm sorry your memory is failing you, but last time it was myself and CRedskinsRule that made you look extremely buffoon-ish. You got basically got punked and never responded.

First of all, everything that I said turned about to be true. How can you make me look like a buffoon when you turn out to be wrong?

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Landry44

First of all, everything that I said turned about to be true. How can you make me look like a buffoon when you turn out to be wrong?

What exactly was I wrong about? I wasn't in love with RGIII before and I'm still not. The moment anyone criticizes him you catch feelings, then proceed to declare that that person doesn't watch any college football. Pretty weak man. And I would be careful about saying everything you declared has come true. Maybe wait until he's successful in the NFL before dubbing yourself a prophet.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by GMScud

What exactly was I wrong about? I wasn't in love with RGIII before and I'm still not. The moment anyone criticizes him you catch feelings, then proceed to declare that that person doesn't watch any college football. Pretty weak man. And I would be careful about saying everything you declared has come true. Maybe wait until he's successful in the NFL before dubbing yourself a prophet.

You was wrong about RG3 and I was right. For the record, I don't object to any criticism as long as it's valid. To say that RG3 isn't a accurate passer if false. Anyone who watches college football know what I'm saying is the truth. Do you agree or disagree? Answer that question before you just to another irrelevant subject.

[SkinzWin]

Originally Posted by Landry44

You exactly was wrong about RG3 and I was right. For the record, I don't object to any criticism as long as it's valid. To say that RG3 isn't a accurate passer if false. Anyone who watches college football know what I'm saying is the truth. Do you agree or disagree? Answer that question before you just to another irrelevant subject.

Then answer his question asking "What exactly was I wrong about" first. Talk about irrelevancy. "You was wrong about RG3 and I was right" is a great facts based rebuttal to his question. And then you tell him he's irrelevant? I love hypocrites.... PS, your grammar is atrocious.

And since you don't object to any criticism as long as it's valid, and my points are all valid, there is no objection, correct? Do you agree or disagree? Answer that question before you just to another irrelevant subject.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Landry44

You was wrong about RG3 and I was right. For the record, I don't object to any criticism as long as it's valid. To say that RG3 isn't a accurate passer if false. Anyone who watches college football know what I'm saying is the truth. Do you agree or disagree? Answer that question before you just to another irrelevant subject.

First of all, huh? I was wrong? "You just to another irrelevant subject." ???

Second, I never said I thought RGIII was a bad player. I just said there were other QB's I liked better than him in the first round, particularly Matt Barkley. If Barkley hadn't stayed in school, I'd still feel that way. So I disagree with the way you anoint RGIII. You still haven't said what I was wrong about. RGIII hasn't even been drafted yet, so you really can't say I was wrong about anything.