Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2012, 10:29 AM   #1
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

What will the Browns do?

Cleveland Browns: Mike Holmgren must stick with Colt McCoy

Quote:
The Indianapolis Colts are expected to use their number one pick on Stanford's Andrew Luck unless they decide to shock the civilized world and go for Griffin III, which given the amount of press received by Griffin III lately--is possible.

Picking second and third are the St. Louis Rams and the Minnesota Vikings. The Rams, with quarterback Sam Bradford would seem to have little interest in picking up a quarterback, however the Vikings may be looking for an upgrade over their quarterback--Christian Ponder.
Funny that the writer is saying what I've been saying for the last 2 1/2 months and I got ridiculed for saying it.

1- Colts could shock everyone and take RGIII.
2- Vikes would be interested in RGIII.
3- Browns would be interested in RGIII.

and to be honest the Rams would be idiots if they didn't look at RGIII to see if he might be better then Bradford. I mean if the Rams are truly in "rebuild" mode then why not start there with your new coaching staff? draft RGIII, keep Bradford, wait until closer to camp or the season and see if you can trade Bradford away for picks and players. If not then you have 2 decent QB's on the roster.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 10:40 AM   #2
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
What will the Browns do?

Cleveland Browns: Mike Holmgren must stick with Colt McCoy



Funny that the writer is saying what I've been saying for the last 2 1/2 months and I got ridiculed for saying it.

1- Colts could shock everyone and take RGIII.
2- Vikes would be interested in RGIII.
3- Browns would be interested in RGIII.

and to be honest the Rams would be idiots if they didn't look at RGIII to see if he might be better then Bradford. I mean if the Rams are truly in "rebuild" mode then why not start there with your new coaching staff? draft RGIII, keep Bradford, wait until closer to camp or the season and see if you can trade Bradford away for picks and players. If not then you have 2 decent QB's on the roster.
You're basically just quoting another fan's opinion, I wouldn't call him a writer.

Who is ridiculing you? Just because someone disagrees with you?

Anything could happen, but the Rams probably wouldn't take RGIII unless they deal Bradford first, and the Vikes seem unlikely to go QB considering they have 2 young QBs they are already high on.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 10:31 AM   #3
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I don't see why that extra Browns pick is so relevant. The redskins 2nd round pick is only like 15 picks after that 2nd Browns 1st rounder. Plus the Redskins have plenty of picks this year and a full compliment next year to trade up for RG3. They can match any Browns offer in one form or another. Almost every team has the picks it just comes down to how many you are willing to part with.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 10:33 AM   #4
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,738
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

An Honest, Non-Homer, Mostly Unbiased Scouting Report on Robert Griffin III | Redskins 101


A good write up on RGIII.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 10:54 AM   #5
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

If the Vikings do land RGIII would Redskins fans be interested in modest trade for Ponder?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 10:56 AM   #6
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
If the Vikings do land RGIII would Redskins fans be interested in modest trade for Ponder?
Sure why not? I didn't really like him in college and honestly don't ever see him as a franchise QB but serviceable. I still want Manning next year
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:06 AM   #7
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Sure why not? I didn't really like him in college and honestly don't ever see him as a franchise QB but serviceable. I still want Manning next year
Yea....in a sense that he would compete for a starting spot vs Tannehill or whoever.....I'm not sold that Ponder is a solution to our problems but I'd rather have him in the stable than Grossman.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:01 AM   #8
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
If the Vikings do land RGIII would Redskins fans be interested in modest trade for Ponder?
Yes, but not at anywhere near the inflated value they drafted him at. I would consider giving them a #2 pick for him assuming we have not already landed a QB of the future some other way.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:26 PM   #9
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
If the Vikings do land RGIII would Redskins fans be interested in modest trade for Ponder?
I would prefer Ponder to Sam Bradford. I thought Ponder displayed a better arm last year (maybe because of indoor home games?) than he did in college. He made all the throws. His problem was that he misread a lot of coverages as a rookie. Bradford's problems are more about physical limitation.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:30 PM   #10
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I would prefer Ponder to Sam Bradford. I thought Ponder displayed a better arm last year (maybe because of indoor home games?) than he did in college. He made all the throws. His problem was that he misread a lot of coverages as a rookie. Bradford's problems are more about physical limitation.
Really? I never really thought arm strength was Bradford's issue. Then again, I never really watched the Rams beyond the one Redskins game...
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 02:36 PM   #11
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
Really? I never really thought arm strength was Bradford's issue. Then again, I never really watched the Rams beyond the one Redskins game...
It's not arm strength that's the issue. It's not accuracy that's the issue. It's that the ball very often dives or sails on him when he's forced to quickly reset, which was pretty much all year this year because the Rams OL was trash.

Bradford is plenty smart enough to get it, but he came into the league really smart, and he's struggled to overcome himself, not to mention his own offense.

Ponder is far from a finished product, but he makes plays. Once he cuts the mistakes out, I think he'll be a very good pro starter. Ponder's problem is he's got to figure out a way to survive as a starter in this league even though the position prototype is shifting away from people who look like him. Bradford looks the part, but his obvious limitations always have me scratching my head as to how he got picked first overall ahead of Suh. Bradford needed a really strong offensive structure and system to be effective, and instead he got: the Rams.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:02 PM   #12
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I wouldn't give up a 2nd for Ponder. Third yes. Nothing higher.

Frankly, I hope that both Cleveland and Minnesota are deeply, deeply committed to their young QB's. I doubt it - but I can hope.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:04 PM   #13
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Just heard on 980AM that the Panthers are "on the verge" of simply releasing Jimmy Clausen. Wow.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:07 PM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Just heard on 980AM that the Panthers are "on the verge" of simply releasing Jimmy Clausen. Wow.
I'm not a big fan but picking him up for nothing seems like a no-brainer
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:13 PM   #15
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I'm not a big fan but picking him up for nothing seems like a no-brainer
He ended the season 3rd on their depth chart and he's due a $920K roster bonus in a few weeks. So.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.76355 seconds with 11 queries