Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Big C

hosley is a deangelo hall clone. i dont think many would want him here. also i think richardson is way too high. theres no way id take him at 6.

Remember when we took Landry over Peterson in 2007 at pick 6 because we had Portis? Yes I'm putting them in the same class if Richardson is there at 6 and we can't trade down I take him. In this whole class the two best non-qbs when it's all said and done will be Trent Richardson and Morris Claiborne and I wouldn't cry uf we got either.

[44Deezel]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Remember when we took Landry over Peterson in 2007 at pick 6 because we had Portis? Yes I'm putting them in the same class if Richardson is there at 6 and we can't trade down I take him. In this whole class the two best non-qbs when it's all said and done will be Trent Richardson and Morris Claiborne and I wouldn't cry uf we got either.

And the Vikings still blow. RB is the least impactful position there is. They were just as good with Toby what's his face in there. No way I take any RB at 6. They're always dinged up and have a very short shelf life. Young and cheap is the way to go with RBs. The ones we have are fine.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by 44Deezel

And the Vikings still blow. RB is the least impactful position there is. They were just as good with Toby what's his face in there. No way I take any RB at 6. They're always dinged up and have a very short shelf life. Young and cheap is the way to go with RBs. The ones we have are fine.

Least impactful position? Really? Next topic.

[Mechanix544]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Least impactful position? Really? Next topic.

What he is saying is true. When you already have Helu and Royster, and probably Hightower coming back, why would you want to use such a high pick on a 4th RB with starting potential? That is absolutly stupid.......Ya, maybe he becomes a fantasy stud, great!!!!! But RB is NOT, I repeat is NOT, an area of need for the Redskins. With the scheme we run, Shanahan can plug my frikkin grandma in there and get positive yards on most plays. We Need a QUARTERBACK!!!!!!! not another frikkin Running back, gimme a break man.

Do whatever to get luck. If that is not an option, then sign Peyton frikkin Manning, BPA on OL or WR with our 6th pick, and get Nick Foles or Tannehill in the second, or try to move up into the late first and get them to sit for 3 years behind Peyton.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Mechanix544

What he is saying is true. When you already have Helu and Royster, and probably Hightower coming back, why would you want to use such a high pick on a 4th RB with starting potential? That is absolutly stupid.......Ya, maybe he becomes a fantasy stud, great!!!!! But RB is NOT, I repeat is NOT, an area of need for the Redskins. With the scheme we run, Shanahan can plug my frikkin grandma in there and get positive yards on most plays. We Need a QUARTERBACK!!!!!!! not another frikkin Running back, gimme a break man.

Do whatever to get luck. If that is not an option, then sign Peyton frikkin Manning, BPA on OL or WR with our 6th pick, and get Nick Foles or Tannehill in the second, or try to move up into the late first and get them to sit for 3 years behind Peyton.

Did I say we needed a RB? RB however is NOT the least impactful position.

[redskin29633]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Remember when we took Landry over Peterson in 2007 at pick 6 because we had Portis? Yes I'm putting them in the same class if Richardson is there at 6 and we can't trade down I take him. In this whole class the two best non-qbs when it's all said and done will be Trent Richardson and Morris Claiborne and I wouldn't cry uf we got either.

I hope the Landry haters don't see this! They will be using it as ammunition against poor Laron. In fact, I have already seen a post that suggests Redskins should draft the best safety we can find with our first pick.

[skinsguy]

Well, I will say this. If Weeden has a nice showing at the Senior bowl and a good combine, I don't see how he would drop to the 3rd round.

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Well, I will say this. If Weeden has a nice showing at the Senior bowl and a good combine, I don't see how he would drop to the 3rd round.

Well he threw 2 interceptions and no tds. Not really a good showing at all, even compared to Grossman. lol... I liked what I saw of him in college but that was awful.

[los panda]

i predict grossman

i want flynn

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07

Well he threw 2 interceptions and no tds. Not really a good showing at all, even compared to Grossman. lol... I liked what I saw of him in college but that was awful.

None of the quarterbacks really impressed me that much yesterday. Maybe Cousins, but neither Weeden nor Foles had me wanting the 'skins to trade down to get either one of those guys. I wished Tannehill had not been injured.