The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

[redskins5044]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

RG3 to Rams; Bradford to Redskins? - Hogs Haven

For a 1st this year & next year, I would do it.

the more i think about it, i wouldnt give up 2 1st round picks for him. he was a 1st round pick and if the rams want to get rid of him he loses some value IMO. i would give up this years 1st and next years 3rd or 4th round pick.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

the more i think about it, i wouldnt give up 2 1st round picks for him. he was a 1st round pick and if the rams want to get rid of him he loses some value IMO. i would give up this years 1st and next years 3rd or 4th round pick.

If we could get him for that I would do that but I don't think that will get him, RGIII & Luck will take so much more. Not losing our 2nd round pick allows us to trade back & still get more/good picks IMO.

[redskins5044]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

If we could get him for that I would do that but I don't think that will get him, RGIII & Luck will take so much more. Not losing our 2nd round pick allows us to trade back & still get more/good picks IMO.

i agree if we attempt to get luck or rg3 we arent going to have many draft picks left. i just think if the rams take RG3 then they are de-vauling bradford and doesnt warrant 2 1st round picks.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

i agree if we attempt to get luck or rg3 we arent going to have many draft picks left. i just think if the rams take RG3 then they are de-vauling bradford and doesnt warrant 2 1st round picks.

Fisher might look at RGIII like McNair they are/were both mobile/accurate/leaders.

[redskins5044]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

Fisher might look at RGIII like McNair they are/were both mobile/accurate/leaders.

i agree, just think that it makes Bradford cheaper.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

Fisher might look at RGIII like McNair they are/were both mobile/accurate/leaders.

Sounds feasible at first...but then you remember McNair was a tough ass dude, like the QB version of Ray Lewis. RGIII won't be the same type of mobile QB. On the scramble to pass spectrum, RGIII will be as far to the "pass" end as Vick is to the "scramble" end.

RGIII may well be the most exciting player in this year's draft, but I bet he's not among the top three QB's from this draft five years from now.

[Mechanix544]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

i agree if we attempt to get luck or rg3 we arent going to have many draft picks left. i just think if the rams take RG3 then they are de-vauling bradford and doesnt warrant 2 1st round picks.

that is a very good point. Thinking Bradford could potentially come "on the cheap" might actually raise his value in other teams wanting to trade for him though.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

i agree if we attempt to get luck or rg3 we arent going to have many draft picks left. i just think if the rams take RG3 then they are de-vauling bradford and doesnt warrant 2 1st round picks.

Where do you get the logic that we won't have many picks left. We could get him only losing a 2nd rounder this year.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Where do you get the logic that we won't have many picks left. We could get him only losing a 2nd rounder this year.

Please expalin, I know the fact that they have the rookie salary cap/scale that has to be counted when trading for Bradford based on his remaining contract.

[30gut]

If the Rams draft RGIII they are essentially 'giving up' on Bradford.
There is no way the asking price for a passed over QB is gonna be anywhere near 2 first round picks.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by 30gut

If the Rams draft RGIII they are essentially 'giving up' on Bradford.
There is no way the asking price for a passed over QB is gonna be anywhere near 2 first round picks.

It's not really the traditional "giving up" situation when there are entirely new decision makers in place and they are in position to get the #2 QB in the current draft. All it's saying is that they prefer RG3 and picks over Bradford. if we get Bradford we are in the game...regardless of the cost.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

the more i think about it, i wouldnt give up 2 1st round picks for him. he was a 1st round pick and if the rams want to get rid of him he loses some value IMO. i would give up this years 1st and next years 3rd or 4th round pick.

And there in lies my point. IF Bradford was such a good QB or a franchise QB they would not be getting g rid of him after only a few yrs. There is no reason to give up 2 first RD picks, heck I don't think I would give up one first RD pick.

Now if the Rams are giving the Skins their #2 pick then yes I guess 2 first RD picks but not for Bradford. My fear is the team tosses in several waisted picks for Bradford who's not going to do much better then Grossman and still be the same old Bradford cause our OL is not any better then the Rams was.

I think the most obsurd statements by the media is its ok for the Skins to give up several picks to the Rams because the Rams have need of them and are "rebuilding". But apparently the Skins are not rebuilding like MS said the team was late in the season. I guess the Skins are all set player wise and don't need anything more then Bradford.