![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: If you had to choose between the two... | |||
| Sign Peyton Manning |
|
43 | 32.82% |
| Trade up for RGIII |
|
88 | 67.18% |
| Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Peyton Manning or RGIII your choice
Quote:
Just to be clear...I like the healthy Manning/RT package also but I like it less because I think we will need to decide before we are positive Manning is healthy. And if we find out he's not healthy after we pull the trigger then we are in big trouble with a washed up Manning and an RT that's not ready. That's the riskier option to me then parting with a couple extra draft picks.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub Last edited by celts32; 02-17-2012 at 03:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Peyton Manning or RGIII your choice
Quote:
And he was certainly a more efficient QB in Baylor's offense then Tannehill was at A&M. But in the NFL both will start from scratch in brand new systems and most pro systems will be closer to A&Ms then Baylor's. But outside of those 2 areas I don't see where the a huge gulf in their skill set exists. What factors do you see that create the vast difference in their skill sets? I think there is as much to suggest that Tannehill could start week 1 as there is to suggest that he couldn't. There is arguably more to suggest that Griffin would need to sit then there is to suggest that Tannehill would need to sit, especially in our offense. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|