Peyton Manning or RGIII your choice

[diehard]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Here's what puzzles me: Some people here don't want to trade next years 1st to get RGIII but would be fine with BPA and trade back into the 1st round to get Tannehill. What do you think we'd be giving up to get back into the first rd? Heinz ketchup?

It's all hypothetical. No one knows how high Tannehill will go. If the estimations are correct and he's valued as a mid-first round pick, then it would cost relatively less to pull off that trade than one at the top of the draft.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by diehard

It's all hypothetical. No one knows how high Tannehill will go. If the estimations are correct and he's valued as a mid-first round pick, then it would cost relatively less to pull off that trade than one at the top of the draft.

He will either go to Seattle or he will fall hard.

[biffle]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

He will either go to Seattle or he will fall hard.

Not necessarily. Another team could trade up for him. Denver or Cleveland (with their second 1st) could be in the market for him.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by biffle

Not necessarily. Another team could trade up for him. Denver or Cleveland (with their second 1st) could be in the market for him.

Good point. I forgot Cleveland at 22.

[biffle]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

Good point. I forgot Cleveland at 22.

Depending on what they do with their first choice, of course.