Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2012, 11:51 AM   #1
Duffman003
Impact Rookie
 
Duffman003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 602
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Does anyone have the chart of the value of each draft pick for trading? I assume it's changed since the new CBA and made the top 5 draft choices a lot more valuable.
__________________
give me food, feed me lunch
'you want water?', B#### give me punch - D12
Duffman003 is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 11:08 AM   #2
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

OK..........but how bout' Wheaton?
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 11:30 AM   #3
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hog1 View Post
OK..........but how bout' Wheaton?
Will?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 11:31 AM   #4
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

The only one I would see going #6 would be Tannehill, and I think even that is a stretch.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:17 PM   #5
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
The only one I would see going #6 would be Tannehill, and I think even that is a stretch.
How about

1. Colts-Luck
2. Rams-Kalil
3. Dolphins (trade with Vikings)-RG3
4. Browns-Blackmon
5. Bucs-Richardson
6. Vikings (trade with Redskins)-Claiborne
7. Jaguars-Ingram
8. Redskins-Tannehill
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:21 PM   #6
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
How about

1. Colts-Luck
2. Rams-Kalil
3. Dolphins (trade with Vikings)-RG3
4. Browns-Blackmon
5. Bucs-Richardson
6. Vikings (trade with Redskins)-Claiborne
7. Jaguars-Ingram
8. Redskins-Tannehill
Not my 1st choice but not bad as long as we have also signed Manning.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:21 PM   #7
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
How about

1. Colts-Luck
2. Rams-Kalil
3. Dolphins (trade with Vikings)-RG3
4. Browns-Blackmon
5. Bucs-Richardson
6. Vikings (trade with Redskins)-Claiborne
7. Jaguars-Ingram
8. Redskins-Tannehill
I would be just fine with that I believe.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:11 PM   #8
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

I could see Kalil and another LT being taken in the top 5.

This could end up being one of those drafts like a couple of years ago. It was the year we drafted Rak, were we saw a couple of teams reach for Oline because there was a run on the top OL guys. There is really good talent at the G and T posisitons this year.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:28 PM   #9
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

This is what I've been trying to get at when I say I don't believe the gap between RG3 and Tannehill is huge

At QB, it's a matter of value - Rich Tandler's Real Redskins

Quote:
Most say it will cost this year’s first- and second-round picks and next year’s first, and perhaps more, to move up to draft Griffin. Instead of the Redskins making that move they could take Tannehill with their own pick, the sixth overall.

So, it’s not a matter of Griffin vs. Tannehill. It’s Griffin v. Tannehill plus whoever the Redskins could get in the second round this year plus the player they could get in the first round next year
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:41 PM   #10
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
This is what I've been trying to get at when I say I don't believe the gap between RG3 and Tannehill is huge

At QB, it's a matter of value - Rich Tandler's Real Redskins
True but if RG3 is a franchise QB and Tannehill is something less then that it won't really matter that you also got a couple other good players. Over the next 10 years the extra cost is marginal...what's important is that they get the QB they believe is the better one. If in their evaluation the grades are very similar then picking Tannehill and keeping the extra picks is the right move.

Basically, I don't want to hear that we got our 3rd favorite QB but look at this lineman we got. No more settling. Franchise QB trumps all other needs...
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:42 PM   #11
diehard
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
This is what I've been trying to get at when I say I don't believe the gap between RG3 and Tannehill is huge

At QB, it's a matter of value - Rich Tandler's Real Redskins
But, the skill gap between Tannehil and RG3 is huge. The value of what it will take to move up to draft RG3 versus taking Tannehill anywhere in the draft is even wider. His example hints taking Tannehill at 6th. To me that's shooting yourself in the foot.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'

Last edited by diehard; 02-24-2012 at 12:44 PM.
diehard is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:47 PM   #12
redskins5044
Playmaker
 
redskins5044's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schertz, Tx
Age: 46
Posts: 3,224
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehard View Post
But, the skill gap between Tannehil and RG3 is huge. The value of what it will take to move up to draft RG3 versus taking Tannehill anywhere in the draft is even wider. His example hints taking Tannehill at 6th. To me that's shooting yourself in the foot.
if they are high on Tannehill and he is the QB they are targeting they might have to take him at #6. cant trade back to far in the 1st round, because still have dolphins and seahawks looking for a QB.
redskins5044 is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 02:22 PM   #13
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
This is what I've been trying to get at when I say I don't believe the gap between RG3 and Tannehill is huge

At QB, it's a matter of value - Rich Tandler's Real Redskins

Most say it will cost this year’s first- and second-round picks and next year’s first, and perhaps more, to move up to draft Griffin. Instead of the Redskins making that move they could take Tannehill with their own pick, the sixth overall.

So, it’s not a matter of Griffin vs. Tannehill. It’s Griffin v. Tannehill plus whoever the Redskins could get in the second round this year plus the player they could get in the first round next year
Good point. I'm still not sold on Tannehill at #6, or even #8 but when you put it in overall value terms like that I can see the logic behind it. I would like to push even further back and get him if they think he is their guy, but then you risk losing him to someone else...glad it isn't my job to figure all this out
Chief X_Phackter is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:49 PM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,043
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

This is the key:

So, it’s not a matter of Griffin vs. Tannehill. It’s Griffin v. Tannehill plus whoever the Redskins could get in the second round this year plus the player they could get in the first round next year.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:57 PM   #15
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: Eight QBs and Where The Latest Rumors Have Them Going

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
This is the key:

So, it’s not a matter of Griffin vs. Tannehill. It’s Griffin v. Tannehill plus whoever the Redskins could get in the second round this year plus the player they could get in the first round next year.
Say RG3 ends up being in a group of the 4th to 8th best QB's in the NFL in a few years and Tannehill is in the next tear of like 10th to 15th. Would you rather have the pretty good QB with a couple picks that also become starters or would you rather have the better QB? I will take the better QB every time...
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.45243 seconds with 11 queries