Yet Another QB Rumors Thread (Volume 9)

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

would you rather take the best corner, wide reciever or tackle in the draft or the 3rd best QB in the draft at 6th?

My opinion of how close the QB are 1. Luck..............2.RG3........................... .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ..............3.Tannehill.

I think that the gap between RGIII and Tannehill is not as big as you make it out to be.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Lotus

I think that the gap between RGIII and Tannehill is not as big as you make it out to be.

your saying you start Tannehill day one then?

I dont see it. I saw Tanny play 3 or 4 games this season. I was never impressed. I dont think he is better than Foles. but hey its just an opinion.

I think you can start RG3 and obviously Luck.

Id take Blackmon over Tanny at 6

[Mechanix544]

[QUOTE=Lotus;889549]I think that the gap between RGIII and Tannehill is not as big as you make it out to be.[/QUOTE

Was that a joke????? If not, I laughed my ass off anyway!!!!!

[44Deezel]

[quote=Mechanix544;889601]

Originally Posted by Lotus

I think that the gap between RGIII and Tannehill is not as big as you make it out to be.[/QUOTE

Was that a joke????? If not, I laughed my ass off anyway!!!!!

I don't think it's that crazy. The fact is no one knows for sure, not even the so called experts who do this for a living. Who cares how high a guy can jump or how fast he can run. The last 10 Super Bowl winning QBs were Eli, Rodgers, Big Ben, Brees, Manning, Brad Johnson and Brady. Go back 2 more years and you can include Kurt Warner and Trent Dilfer.

Eli and Peyton were the only ones taken first overall. History tells us that it's highly likely that one or more QBs taken AFTER Luck and RGIII will go on to have similar or better careers. Why not Tannehill? Anything you think you know from their college tape or combine workouts could become irrelevant in a few years.

It's like they said in the Brady 6 documentary. No one could crack open his chest and look at his heart. What makes me laugh are the comments about long ball accuracy, arm strength, mobility, etc. it's all mostly BS. No one here knows for sure.

[Mechanix544]

[quote=44Deezel;889611]

Originally Posted by Mechanix544

I don't think it's that crazy. The fact is no one knows for sure, not even the so called experts who do this for a living. Who cares how high a guy can jump or how fast he can run. The last 10 Super Bowl winning QBs were Eli, Rodgers, Big Ben, Brees, Manning, Brad Johnson and Brady. Go back 2 more years and you can include Kurt Warner and Trent Dilfer.

Eli and Peyton were the only ones taken first overall. History tells us that it's highly likely that one or more QBs taken AFTER Luck and RGIII will go on to have similar or better careers. Why not Tannehill? Anything you think you know from their college tape or combine workouts could become irrelevant in a few years.

No No No. I didnt mean it like that. I was still thinking of the periods being used as a measurment in some previous post that his post alludes to. I think Tannehill is going to be a top 10 QB in 2 or 3 years.