Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Colts Officially Release Peyton Manning (QB Thread #11)

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2012, 11:41 AM   #1
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
re: Colts Officially Release Peyton Manning (QB Thread #11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
Peyton Manning: Redskins poised for a hard sell to superstar QB - The Insider - The Washington Post

It's all speculation, but I think the Redskins should pass on Manning. I understand he's the best free agent in NFL history, but this team has to draft their own. Unless they intend to draft a rookie quarterback like Tannehill, Foles, or Weeden to back up Manning, then signing Manning wouldn't make much sense. Grossman and Beck are not good enough to even be back ups. Jonathan Crompton might be another option at QB but we don't know much about him yet. So, maybe they can draft a QB and develop him.
I'm a bit confused by your post
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 03-07-2012, 11:49 AM   #2
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
re: Colts Officially Release Peyton Manning (QB Thread #11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I'm a bit confused by your post

I guess what he's trying to say is that the Redskins should draft RGIII, he just went the way of China to get to that point.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 03-07-2012, 12:38 PM   #3
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
re: Colts Officially Release Peyton Manning (QB Thread #11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I'm a bit confused by your post
Basically, I was saying that Manning is an aging veteran who is not a long term solution. He'd be a Redskin maybe until Shanahan's contract is up. Drafting RG3 would be much better. Because of the risk involved with Manning, GM Bruce Allen and head coach Mike Shanahan should pass on him. If they do sign him, then they should draft a Tannehill, Weeden, or Foles to learn from Manning and develop. Since Grossman doesn't have a contract and Crompton and Beck does, I'd favor Crompton backing up Manning since Beck isn't a quality back up let alone a quality starter. I hope I'm understood now.

Last edited by REDSKINS4ever; 03-07-2012 at 12:45 PM.
REDSKINS4ever is offline  
Old 03-07-2012, 01:04 PM   #4
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
re: Colts Officially Release Peyton Manning (QB Thread #11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever View Post
Basically, I was saying that Manning is an aging veteran who is not a long term solution. He'd be a Redskin maybe until Shanahan's contract is up. Drafting RG3 would be much better. Because of the risk involved with Manning, GM Bruce Allen and head coach Mike Shanahan should pass on him. If they do sign him, then they should draft a Tannehill, Weeden, or Foles to learn from Manning and develop. Since Grossman doesn't have a contract and Crompton and Beck does, I'd favor Crompton backing up Manning since Beck isn't a quality back up let alone a quality starter. I hope I'm understood now.
Yes, I missed the word "unless" in your original post which is key to your post
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.59373 seconds with 11 queries