Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Count me as one.

I hear that. I asked him why he chose RG3 as his Twitter moniker if he doesn't like that nickname, but I'm not expecting a response seeing as how he's new to Twitter.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

When the SKINS meet RG3 in Waco they told him we traded up for you.

They talked to RG3 about how they plan to use him (might of gave him a playbook).

RG3 is not allowing Indy to leverage a pick from the SKINS to get him.

Still holding on to that ridiculous notion of the Colts drafting RGIII and trading him to us for later picks huh?

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Still holding on to that ridiculous notion of the Colts drafting RGIII and trading him to us for later picks huh?

Is that what you took from what I wrote.

[Gtothearry]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Still holding on to that ridiculous notion of the Colts drafting RGIII and trading him to us for later picks huh?

That's hilarious! The Colts only have one pick and we certainly aren't going to give up more picks to get RGIII or Luck when we will have one or the other. I can't fathom how someone could logically think this could happen.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

Is that what you took from what I wrote.

What did your last sentence say?

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

What did your last sentence say?

RG3 is not allowing Indy to leverage a pick from the SKINS to get him.


Read everything I typed. Basically he's not playing the game. Knows SKINS traded up for him.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

RG3 is not allowing Indy to leverage a pick from the SKINS to get him.


Read everything I typed. Basically he's not playing the game. Knows SKINS traded up for him.

How would Indy leverage a pick from us to get him? You think the Skins wouldn't be happy with Luck?

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by mooby

How would Indy leverage a pick from us to get him? You think the Skins wouldn't be happy with Luck?

Have you ever listened to Irsay speak/talk he's not that bright, he thinks anythings possible.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

Yes, seriously. He turned them down.

Reading is fundamental.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Reading is fundamental.

Easy for you to say.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

RG3 is not allowing Indy to leverage a pick from the SKINS to get him.





Read everything I typed. Basically he's not playing the game. Knows SKINS traded up for him.

If you don't see it then I can't help you.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

Easy for you to say.

You're right. None of those words were hard to pronounce.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

You're right. None of those words were hard to pronounce.

Great job. I am so happy for you.

[CultBrennan59]

I'm sure this has been mentioned a lot here, but, lets say for a second we had the #1 overall pick, Do you still take RG3 or Luck?

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

I'm sure this has been mentioned a lot here, but, lets say for a second we had the #1 overall pick, Do you still take RG3 or Luck?

Luck. He's less of an injury risk (Lucks one broken finger trumps RG3's torn ACL and concussion in terms of durability) and he has already excelled in a pro style offense showing the ability to call protections, audibles, look off the safety, and progress to the third option on the opposite side of the field on multiple occasions (all extremely underrated qualities in fan evaluations). From what I've read he's basically a mobile Peyton Manning.

Also in spite of not having the same level of elusiveness as RG3 he can still escape the pocket and buy time for receivers to get open down field.

It is tough though. They're both incredibly talented. I feel like this "rivalry" is going to be like Eli vs Rivers on steroids.