Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2?
Yes 193 91.47%
No 18 8.53%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2012, 11:23 PM   #1
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by warriorzpath View Post
But sometimes you have to go all in. RGIII is not going to be a dud. And the redskins finally have a potentially great qb. In the nfl, a great qb and a great defensive line may be all you need. It could be argued that- that's what the giants had this year.

It appeared to be true- Shanahan would be fired if he didn't pick up RGIII or Manning- or by some miracle another qb would have been able to play well enough for redskins to get into the playoffs.

What would you have done in Shanahans place?
Instead of giving up 3 #1's and a #2, I'd have stayed at 6 and taken Tannehill.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:28 PM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Instead of giving up 3 #1's and a #2, I'd have stayed at 6 and taken Tannehill.
In all honesty, I happen to prefer what the Redskins actually did to taking Tannehill at six.

But I have to be right about BOTH Griffin AND Tannehill. If not right about both, then I am wrong about preferring this trade.

If Griffin isn't the clear no. 1 on the depth chart in 2014 for whatever reason and Tannehill is starting in this league, this will be the worst trade in modern NFL history, and what Shanahan will ultimately be remembered for, instead of the super bowls.

So yeah, this is very much going all-in. Recklessly all-in.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:32 PM   #3
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
In all honesty, I happen to prefer what the Redskins actually did to taking Tannehill at six.

But I have to be right about BOTH Griffin AND Tannehill. If not right about both, then I am wrong about preferring this trade.

If Griffin isn't the clear no. 1 on the depth chart in 2014 for whatever reason and Tannehill is starting in this league, this will be the worst trade in modern NFL history, and what Shanahan will ultimately be remembered for, instead of the super bowls.

So yeah, this is very much going all-in. Recklessly all-in.
Agreed. Just a bit too reckless for my taste right now. Like I said, Griffin had better be solid gold. Forget clear #1 by 2014; we'd better be talking Pro Bowl in 2014.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:34 PM   #4
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Agreed. Just a bit too reckless for my taste right now. Like I said, Griffin had better be solid gold. Forget clear #1 by 2014; we'd better be talking Pro Bowl in 2014.
On the bright side, at least we have higher expectations for this quarterback than "worth two weeks of Doug Dutch."
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:36 PM   #5
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
On the bright side, at least we have higher expectations for this quarterback than "worth two weeks of Doug Dutch."
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:42 PM   #6
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Agreed. Just a bit too reckless for my taste right now. Like I said, Griffin had better be solid gold. Forget clear #1 by 2014; we'd better be talking Pro Bowl in 2014.
For me I think RG3 will either be a mega bust or a mega star. I don't really see him being an average qb in the NFL. He will either be incredible at everything he does (which I think has a decent chance of happening) or he will be incredibly bad at everything he does. So if he's incredibly good, we might be talking about him being a Pro Bowler sooner than 2014. I expect the Shannies to put him in a position to succeed. For the price they paid he will be the day one starter, no questions asked.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:33 PM   #7
SOUL-SKINS
Impact Rookie
 
SOUL-SKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 896
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
In all honesty, I happen to prefer what the Redskins actually did to taking Tannehill at six.

But I have to be right about BOTH Griffin AND Tannehill. If not right about both, then I am wrong about preferring this trade.

If Griffin isn't the clear no. 1 on the depth chart in 2014 for whatever reason and Tannehill is starting in this league, this will be the worst trade in modern NFL history, and what Shanahan will ultimately be remembered for, instead of the super bowls.

So yeah, this is very much going all-in. Recklessly all-in.
C'mon Tripp .... I knew u rain on our parade ... Lol. Whatever. I'm so f'ing happy
__________________
TODD COLLINS WILL ALWAYS HOLD A SPECIAL PLACE IN MY HEART
SOUL-SKINS is offline  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:36 PM   #8
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by SOUL-SKINS View Post
C'mon Tripp .... I knew u rain on our parade ... Lol. Whatever. I'm so f'ing happy
Hey, you're welcome to tell me I'm wrong.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.51337 seconds with 12 queries