![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2? | |||
| Yes |
|
193 | 91.47% |
| No |
|
18 | 8.53% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
This trade is a bad one for the Redskins. They have once again given up too much compensation for a player and have undervalued the draft. I have a difficult time actually seeing this as being any different than any other trade that they have made in the last 12 years. If anyone had thrown out this trade as a hypothetical there would have been 50 pages of people saying "that is horrible, it is mortgaging the Redskins future!" Then it actually happens and people are dancing in the streets. And a picture of Griffin holding a Lombardi trophy. Really? At least the expectations are realistic and you recognize the immense value that the Redskins have given up. To put it in concrete terms, if the Giants had made this trade in 2004 for Eli Manning and you look at the players picked with the equivalent picks that the Redskins gave up, it is Phillip Rivers, Chris Snee, Shawn Merriman, and Santonio Holmes (Giants traded out of pick 25, they actually drafted Kiwanuka). Every one of those players has played in a Pro Bowl. Hey, but at least the Redskins are only one player away from a championship! Plus this trade will actually have compounding results because it will compel the Redskins to go and overpay for marginal players in free agency (I'm thinking Colston and VJax, but just throw in their equivalents, guys who will be overpaid based upon their numbers in very favorable offensive systems with very good QBs), both this year and in coming years. The only one (admittedly I did not read EVERY post) willing to actually say that the Redskins horribly overpaid is GTripp. I think Redskins fans might just get what they deserve.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Wow, I absolutely love Griff.
I'm gonna have to stick my head in the sand on the cost though. HTTR! |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
But im with you 100% 30, I gonna stick my head in the sand and at 430 in the morning, start drinking again...HTTR!
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Wish it was conditional at least. If RGIII is a bust and doesn't start at least half the games in 2013 the pick turns into a 2nd or 3rd. Is that even possible?
__________________
I am a system poster. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
I'm hearing the Browns attempted to match our offer but we already had an agreement in place with the Rams. So, the Rams didn't renig on the deal after it was in place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 155
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
We need to a build a team. An athletic qb with accuracy, a run game, and a turnover based D sounds like it a good foundations in today's league. Only time will tell if we gave up too much. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|