NFL taking away Redskins cap space

[MTK]

Cowboys, Redskins exploring all options | ProFootballTalk

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Cowboys, Redskins exploring all options | ProFootballTalk

If that's the case then the NFL should never of gave the penalty in the first place they opened themselves up for this.

[mbedner3420]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

If that's the case then the NFL should never of gave the penalty in the first place they opened themselves up for this.

I agree. I think we'll eventually get a substantial portion of our money back, but it won't matter. The NFL will have already gotten what it wanted: the Redskins and Cowboys to miss out on the major FA this off-season.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by mbedner3420

I agree. I think we'll eventually get a substantial portion of our money back, but it won't matter. The NFL will have already gotten what it wanted: the Redskins and Cowboys to miss out on the major FA this off-season.

How have we missed out on anything? We've behaved as if the penalty never happened. Please don't cite VJax - there are reasons to think that we weren't interested in him anyway.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mbedner3420

I agree. I think we'll eventually get a substantial portion of our money back, but it won't matter. The NFL will have already gotten what it wanted: the Redskins and Cowboys to miss out on the major FA this off-season.

That's not what this is about, neither the Skins, who signed multiple targeted players, or the Cowboys, who signed their sought after CB, were overly hampered by the penalty. What it was about, and the NFL basically said this in their statement from Sunday, was making sure that the salary cap number did not drop below last year's cap. I tend to think that the Skins/Cowboys took the hit because the 2 owners both are very strong League supporters in Big Markets, and therefore have the ability to overcome the penalty. Other places that were not singled out, like GB, who is a small market and thus the hit would be more unbearable, or Chicago, whose owner is a tightwad, were not good candidates for taking on a revenue sharing conundrum.