Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Add WRs Pierre Garcon and Joshua Morgan

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-17-2012, 01:31 AM   #10
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Redskins Add WRs Pierre Garcon and Joshua Morgan

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
I agree with your points, but if Kyle decides none of the guys stand out from each other (i.e. we have a collective group of #2's but not one clear guy we can always depend on to beat the d) and then schemes to exploit mismatches on d, then the relevance of the #1 wide receiver is minimized. But if he decides to draw up plays designed to get Garcon the ball the most, then yes Garcon would be defined as the #1.
I think the best definition of '#1' WR comes from how the defense defends the WR in question.

A true '#1' WR is a player that a defense will gameplan to stop/limit by using various coverage schemes designed to take that player away.

I think most teams design play concepts that fit both of the ideas you mentioned above.
There are certain plays designed to get a particular receiver X, Z, or Y (etc) the ball e.g. WR screen plays, 1 man or 2 man routes off play action etc.
But, more often then not teams design plays with multiple options designed to attack a particular coverage with the intent to get a primary receiver open then (based on the defenses coverage as the QB reads his post snap progressions post snaps) get receivers option 2, 3 and sometimes even 4 and 5 open if the defense tries to take option #1 away.
That's why its critical to have a QB that can smoothly transition from their primary option to their secondary and tertiary options.

If you go back to 2010 I think it was clear that Moss, although not a 'true' No.1 receiver, was our number 1 receiving option and was targeted 146 times and the results were top 10 production in both yards and catches: 93 for 1,115.

Pro Football Focus did a nice breakdown of Sanatana Moss from 2010:
2010 Snap Breakdown - Santana Moss | ProFootballFocus.com

If Kyle keeps Moss or the slot WR as his focus as they've been doing the past couple of seasons then Moss/slot WRs numbers could actually improve from 2010 with the increased performance from the X and Z receivers respectively. (however it shakes out Garcon/Gaffney or Garcon/Morgan etc)
The upgrade to the WR corps as a unit will have a postive and somewhat symbiotic effect between the X, Z and slot receivers where the improved play from from 1 receiver position forces the defense to adjust which in turn makes it easier for the other receivers production to increase.

Last edited by 30gut; 03-17-2012 at 03:49 AM.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.05554 seconds with 11 queries