Trayvon Martin Case

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by saden1

I wasn't aware I had to be at the scene to evaluate and determine what happened from the facts on record...I suppose I should make my way to Darfur too before I should condemn the Janjaweeds.

You sound WAAAAY to personally invested to make a reasoned argument based on how you're posting. Calm down.

Originally Posted by saden1

Try exercising your brain once in a while... at the very least it will make feel smarter.

Adjust your head-pointer, the sweat is making you miss words.

How smart would I need to be to post on this forum? They allow you to post so I'm happy I can exceed whatever entrance exam you've passed.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

You sound WAAAAY to personally invested to make a reasoned argument based on how you're posting. Calm down.

I am personally invested because if it can happen to Trayvon it could happen to my on son. Why shouldn't anyone else for that matter be invested? Or maybe the thinking is "just another nigger in the wrong place at the wrong time...right?"

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Adjust your head-pointer, the sweat is making you miss words.

How smart would I need to be to post on this forum? They allow you to post so I'm happy I can exceed whatever entrance exam you've passed.

Apparently not very smart but this has been the case for a while. It just so happens that it's becoming more and more blatant nowadays. You would think this case wouldn't require much brain power to analyze the fail points in this case.

Hearing you lot you would think Trayvon murdered himself. It's disgusting.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by saden1

Hearing you lot you would think Trayvon murdered himself. It's disgusting.

You lot? I don't think you're reading the responses clearly.

If anything most if not all posters are siding with the victim.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

You lot? I don't think you're reading the responses clearly.

If anything most if not all posters are siding with the victim.

It doesn't sound like it. But then again all I have to go by is statments like:

Over zealous curtain-twitcher meets mouthy teenager.

I think Zimmerman caused the problem but I don't think the other guy is the innocent little boy thay mak him out to be.

To hear shit like the above is very troubling...and people pretending this has nothing to do with race and ignoring police conduct is even more troubling. The truth is self-evident and race is written all over this case whether you want to see it or not.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by saden1

It doesn't sound like it. But then again all I have to go by is statments like:


To hear shit like the above is very troubling...and people pretending this has nothing to do with race and ignoring police conduct is even more troubling. The truth is self-evident and race is written all over this case whether you want to see it or not.

Re-read both of your examples, if you don't mind, and highlight the part where it mentions race. Both mention age.

Police conduct notwithstanding, where are you seeing people 'pretending' that it's not about race? We are addressing the race issue not ignoring it.

I think you have issues.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Re-read both of your examples, if you don't mind, and highlight the part where it mentions race. Both mention age.

Police conduct notwithstanding, where are you seeing people 'pretending' that it's not about race? We are addressing the race issue not ignoring it.

I think you have issues.

You damn right I have issues and why shouldn't? Police conduct notwithstanding? Are we side stepping race as an issue when it comes to police conduct?


All you do is stick your head in the sand and say race isn't an issue but you never once mentioned why it isn't.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by saden1

You damn right I have issues and why shouldn't? Police conduct notwithstanding? Are we side stepping race as an issue when it comes to police conduct?

I'm not even getting to the Police conduct in this, I was just commenting on the initial Vigilante Vs. Kid scenario.

Originally Posted by saden1

All you do is stick your head in the sand and say race isn't an issue but you never once mentioned why it isn't.

Because I think the shooter would have used another unpleasant descriptive for any color kid he thought was up to no good.

So just to confirm: You didn't find a reference to race in either quotes you posted, did you?

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by saden1

You damn right I have issues and why shouldn't? Police conduct notwithstanding? Are we side stepping race as an issue when it comes to police conduct?


All you do is stick your head in the sand and say race isn't an issue but you never once mentioned why it isn't.

You don't know what evidence the cops do or don't have so your assuming alot with what your saying about the cops. That's not different then someone assuming the kid was mouthy teen.