![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
I still don't understand how the Bears dumping almost $35 mil of Pepper's salary is not seen as a competitive advantage.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
Quote:
I was going to joke and say the limit was $10mill or more but your right the Bears dumped $35mill and no penalty. The whole punishment looks shady when you add all the teams who reworked contracts and saved money but only the two teams who are in the same division as the owner who levied the punishment gets punished? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 5,455
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
I looked into it more, his charged salary for that year was around 20 million, and the year before with Carolina he earned 19 million, so it wasn't much of a change
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,614
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
That's still a 15 million dollar difference. If a player had a 20 mil cap hit in 2010 and a 5 mil cap hit in 2011, wouldn't you be saying they did the same thing we did? A 15 million dollar difference is still big. I think the reason we got punished and the Bears didn't was because John Mara doesn't give a crap about the Bears and we are his division rivals.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
But according to that graphic, the Bears took a 34.9 million cap hit that year and this is the highest compared to the rest of the years in the contract. I am not well versed in cap details, but I see this as an unfair competitive advantage, since the Bears were able to sign one of the top DEs in the league and take a 35 million cap hit during the uncapped season.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|