Griffin's impact on the off-season FA/draft

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I wonder if both the Colts and Redskins have talked and have said, "OK, we're taking Luck, you're taking Griffin. Right? Right." That way both teams can start prepping...

[los panda]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I wonder if both the Colts and Redskins have talked and have said, "OK, we're taking Luck, you're taking Griffin. Right? Right." That way both teams can start prepping...

it would be nice if the colts were that thoughtful. it's no sweat off their sacks either way, but why would they?

[Monksdown]

There isnt really a benefit to them. Negligable as it is, if we're a little worried that we may not get our guy, than we focus less on the later rounds.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I wonder if both the Colts and Redskins have talked and have said, "OK, we're taking Luck, you're taking Griffin. Right? Right." That way both teams can start prepping...

I hope so. I mean they're at the point where all the evidence is at the table, and they probably should've been able to come to a conclusion by now. Contract shouldn't even be a problem with the rookie wage scale, so all the talk about using RG3 as leverage shouldn't be as big a deal because the difference between paying the two should be minimal, if there is a difference at all.

I've been hearing small talk that Jim Irsay knows which qb he's taking, that he's been selling the Colts fanbase on the idea of Luck for a long time now, and if that's the case then all the talk he's putting out about being undecided is just hogwash. In all honesty if I were going to put money on it I think by now the Colts would've told the Redskins which guy they're taking, which in all inevitability will probably be Luck.