Unit Analysis: Running Backs

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

I am not going to argue with the grades. All I will say though is that the criteria for the grades seems to change from team to team. It seems they came up with a grade and then figured out how to justify it. Basically that is the silliest thing I have seen in SN.
Someone explain how a team with a RB who "showed star potential"(Jones) and a "quality backup"(Thomas) gets a B+ and a team with a star RB(Portis) and a potential quality backup(Betts) gets a B. Not arguing that both grades are wrong but at least one is. 2+1=3 just like 1+2=3. Dumb idiots at SN...

No, with political correctness 2+1=2 as long as you tried to answer it.LOL