Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


RGIII Named Starter

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2012, 10:05 AM   #1
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Should also be noted that it's 1st team offense vs. 2nd team defense, and 2nd team offense vs. 1st team defense
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 02:01 PM   #2
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 57
Posts: 3,803
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Should also be noted that it's 1st team offense vs. 2nd team defense, and 2nd team offense vs. 1st team defense
Yeah, I hope are #2 defense is not that much of a drop of from our #1 defense, same for the offense.
NYCskinfan82 is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:09 AM   #3
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Whens the last time a rookie QB with this much hoohaa has been named the starter so early in the season?
Anyone know?
And did it work out?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:13 AM   #4
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Crompton is the clear starter. They're just giving Griffin reps so that his feelings don't get hurt. Crompton is such a stud that he needs no reps.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:23 AM   #5
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,615
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Crompton is the clear starter. They're just giving Griffin reps so that his feelings don't get hurt. Crompton is such a stud that he needs no reps.
I know you love the Crompton but you need to give a little more respect to Rex Grossman. Remember, that is the guy who beat out John friggin Beck for a starting job last season. He's shown an ability to win when faced with an underdog role.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:21 AM   #6
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
Whens the last time a rookie QB with this much hoohaa has been named the starter so early in the season?
Anyone know?
And did it work out?
Pretty sure Cam Newton was named an early starter.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 11:13 AM   #7
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07 View Post
Pretty sure Cam Newton was named an early starter.
He wasn't officially named starter until August actually. He was struggling in camp but lit up the defenses when the regular season started.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 11:57 AM   #8
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
Whens the last time a rookie QB with this much hoohaa has been named the starter so early in the season?
Anyone know?
And did it work out?
I don't know the last time, but Peyton Manning started all 16 games his rookie season so I assume there was some amount of hoopla there. I would say that worked out.

Eli didn't start his first game, neither did Roethlisberger
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 03:05 PM   #9
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I don't know the last time, but Peyton Manning started all 16 games his rookie season so I assume there was some amount of hoopla there. I would say that worked out.

Eli didn't start his first game, neither did Roethlisberger
Well more recently wouldn't we say Stafford was named early on? I was going to say Andy Dalton but if I'm not mistaken I think he had to win the job... maybe not. How about Sanchez? didn't the take him right after Favre left.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:36 AM   #10
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Shanny might say that he doesn't pay attention to the press & public reaction, and maybe he doesen't, but naming RGIII the starter so early seems in part designed to avoid any talk of qb controversy.
freddyg12 is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:59 PM   #11
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 57
Posts: 3,803
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
Shanny might say that he doesn't pay attention to the press & public reaction, and maybe he doesen't, but naming RGIII the starter so early seems in part designed to avoid any talk of qb controversy.
IMO MS knows RG3's shoulders can handle the weight, MS likes/loves how he carries himself.
NYCskinfan82 is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 10:40 AM   #12
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: RGIII Named Starter

You don't give up what the Skins did for him and not plug him in as the starter on day 1.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 11:11 AM   #13
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,657
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
You don't give up what the Skins did for him and not plug him in as the starter on day 1.
Exactly. RG3 starts day one, give him most of the reps and build the offense around him. So far, the Shanahan's are doing all the right things w/ RG3.
skinsfan69 is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 11:35 AM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Shanahan also said they will adjust the offense to suit RG3, and they're not going to toss the entire playbook at him, I know some were concerned about those things.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:04 PM   #15
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 57
Posts: 1,559
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Mike Shannahan is putting his whole future on RGIII by naming him the starter. Once the draft trade went down the way it did in March he knew this was the way it was going to be. Either they both succeed together or Mike will be gone for failing to win with another QB. Somehow I think this time it will work.
scowan is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.81005 seconds with 11 queries