![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 158
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
Quote:
They disagree with you. Period. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
No, I read what you wrote. The clauses that your referring to are extremely vague. They can be used to justify literally anything. No arbitrator on this planet will let the nfl have free reign to do whatever it wants. Vague phrases like that have to be interpreted a little deeper. I'm fairly confident it will be concluded that those clauses can only be applied to actions that have recently been brought to the nfl's attention...not actions that were approved by the nfl 2 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 158
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
Quote:
1) The NFL bylaws are illegal, and 2) An arbitrator appointed under the CBA with only the power to enforce the CBA is going to overturn the NFL Bylaws? That's what you're saying? No matter how much you wish it didn't mean what it means, and no matter how much power you wish the arbitrator had, doesn't make it true. Last edited by HoopheadVII; 05-08-2012 at 01:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,603
|
Re: Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess
Quote:
http://static.nfl.com/static/content...rs/pdf/co_.pdf
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|