A question of style: Evan, Roy or Tim?

[30gut]

Originally Posted by VegasSkinsFan

I've noticed your tone throughout this thread to be either argumentative or condescending. It makes it difficult to have a conversation with you.

I try to post in a conversational manner the same as I would if we were sitting down talking at a sports bar.
I'm sure just like any poster, yourself included, there are times my posts maybe perceived as argumentative or maybe even condescending but its rarely my intent.
Believe me if I wanted to come across as argumentative and condescending it would be much, much worse then our current discourse.

On my end there is no overall condescension meant in my tone, but I respond more or less the way I'm addressed.
I view our discussion as 2 guys that have a philosophical disagreement about football.*shrugs*
I'm just a guy that likes to discuss football in specifics.

That said why would a gm that trades away Barry sanders have to win at least 1 Super Bowl? That's one more than Barry won.

Should the Dolphins have traded away Dan Marino or the Bills Jim Kelly or the Oilers/Moon etc none of them won superbowls?
Barry Sanders was an elite RB and a HOF talent and you don't trade away elite talent in their prime unless someone offers you the world.

Barry Sanders carried a pretty pitful Detoit team and franchise its not Barry's fault they couldn't build a championship team around him.

Find a trade were a team traded away a top running back and got worse.

I'm not gonna argue a point I'm not making.