![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
And Crompton is that man! (Or Lindley, Harnisch, or Austin Davis IMO).
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Keep in mind that the question marks along the OLs and DBs are about injuries, not the lack of depth (numbers).
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
People are assuming that Jonathan Crompton is the odd man out behind Cousins and and Grossman. But if Crompton ends up having a good camp and a greater preseason than Cousins and Grossman, then the coaches are going to have to evaluate him fairly
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Crompton has slightly less than zero chance...unless (heaven forbid) there is some disastrous injury
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Brown could be back by the opener, really
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DC
Age: 38
Posts: 1,300
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Rookies going to be thrown right into the fire.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
For the hypothetical crowd:
Long term would you rather have Massie and a late round rookie backup QB or Cousins and a 2013 2nd round RT draft pick?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
I like the Cousins move. I just wished that some of the moves we were attempting to make during the offseason would have panned out. Can't control everything though...
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,742
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Ross Tucker said several weeks ago, it is amazing how many teams have OL and secondary issues, and I agree with that. There seems to be a bit of lacking in the "named talent" of the OL pool. Add to that the fact that consistency among the line is a key ingredient to any successful line, and I think our guys who came on at the end of last year ought to be given every opportunity to show what they can do this year.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
I agree w/ cutting Brown now. This guy gets more gimpy each year and if anything he just breaks up whatever "consistency" we could have across the oline by starting one of the younger guys.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|