Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


We've got big trouble on the OL.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-31-2012, 06:27 PM   #1
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

There may not have been. People are hoping a six round pick in Compton is the answer. The grass is always greener though when it comes to a pick you think the team should have made instead of the one they did.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 06:45 PM   #2
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

I've never really understood the "I don't know if there were any good linemen at that point in the draft, but we should have taken one anyway" argument
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 07:29 PM   #3
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I've never really understood the "I don't know if there were any good linemen at that point in the draft, but we should have taken one anyway" argument
What about the "Brown has been injured since day 1 with the Skins, but this year it will be different" argument or the "RG3 will make the Oline better". Because rookie QB usually have that affect on Olines.

This is completely on Shanny and Bruce. Ive been relatively easy on and supportive of both, but I think its a bit naive to depend on Willie Smith as plan B for a RT who hasn't performed the entire time in the B&G. I dunno, is that an unreasonable view? I'm hoping for the best and by no means think this is the end of season, but jeez its a lil perplexing we wouldn't a have a better plan RT at this point.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 08:01 PM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
What about the "Brown has been injured since day 1 with the Skins, but this year it will be different" argument or the "RG3 will make the Oline better". Because rookie QB usually have that affect on Olines.

This is completely on Shanny and Bruce. Ive been relatively easy on and supportive of both, but I think its a bit naive to depend on Willie Smith as plan B for a RT who hasn't performed the entire time in the B&G. I dunno, is that an unreasonable view? I'm hoping for the best and by no means think this is the end of season, but jeez its a lil perplexing we wouldn't a have a better plan RT at this point.
Actually Polumbus would be plan B.

I guess I just don't see the big deal considering we were down 3 starters last year for the last month or so, and the line played arguably their best ball of the season during that stretch.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 08:36 PM   #5
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I've never really understood the "I don't know if there were any good linemen at that point in the draft, but we should have taken one anyway" argument
Haven't heard this argument.
But, there were good OL prospects.

Whether or not they become good lineman remains to be seen like with any prospect at any position.
30gut is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 08:43 PM   #6
RGIII
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Haven't heard this argument.
But, there were good OL prospects.

Whether or not they become good lineman remains to be seen like with any prospect at any position.
Drafting an OT instead of Cousins would've made sense too. Doesn't mean that OT would've been any better than Polumbus, Smith, or Black at this point in the season or down the road.

However, that OT could've been just as promising depth-wise as Cousins is.
RGIII is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:04 PM   #7
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RGIII View Post
Drafting an OT instead of Cousins would've made sense too. Doesn't mean that OT would've been any better than Polumbus, Smith, or Black at this point in the season or down the road.

However, that OT could've been just as promising depth-wise as Cousins is.
And probably more likely to play for us. Not knocking the pick we made... if we didn't think anyone could contribute more to the team then fine.
tryfuhl is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:17 PM   #8
RGIII
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
And probably more likely to play for us. Not knocking the pick we made... if we didn't think anyone could contribute more to the team then fine.

The world will never know...
RGIII is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:12 PM   #9
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RGIII View Post
Drafting an OT instead of Cousins would've made sense too. Doesn't mean that OT would've been any better than Polumbus, Smith, or Black at this point in the season or down the road.

However, that OT could've been just as promising depth-wise as Cousins is.
Bringing Cousins into the discussion just confuses the discussion with peoples knee jerk desire to defend the Cousins pick so I'm not gonna comment on it.
But, with Jammal Brown's level of play, injury and missed starts an argument could be made that addressing the RT position should have been a higher priority.
I like profootball focus metrics and Jammal Brown had a terrible rating. (-18)
According to PFF Tyler was better then Brown but not by much (-16), but at least Tyler is young and you expect him to improve with playing time and maybe he develops into a league average RT?

But, right now that's just a hope.
And if Tyler is gonna be a starter then where is our quality depth?

Imo finding a more certain solution to the RT situation should have been a much higher priority.
30gut is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:34 PM   #10
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Bringing Cousins into the discussion just confuses the discussion with peoples knee jerk desire to defend the Cousins pick so I'm not gonna comment on it.
But, with Jammal Brown's level of play, injury and missed starts an argument could be made that addressing the RT position should have been a higher priority.
I like profootball focus metrics and Jammal Brown had a terrible rating. (-18)
According to PFF Tyler was better then Brown but not by much (-16), but at least Tyler is young and you expect him to improve with playing time and maybe he develops into a league average RT?

But, right now that's just a hope.
And if Tyler is gonna be a starter then where is our quality depth?

Imo finding a more certain solution to the RT situation should have been a much higher priority.
What knee jerk desire to defend? Is that somehow different from the knee jerk "well we should have drafted an OL there" Never mind that we went OL with the pick before Cousins.

We have had a lot of areas to address over the past two years: needed a franchise caliber LT-drafted Williams; needed to upgrade at WR-drafted Hankerson, signed Garcon and Morgan; needed youth at RB-drafted Helu and Royster; needed help for Orakpo-drafted Kerrigan; needed a franchise QB for the next 15 years (hopefully)-drafted RG3; needed to shore up the offensive interior-signed Kory L. (funny how so many are mourning his injury when just two years ago they thought he was a bum), signed Chester, drafted LeRibeus and Gettis...and so on.

And let's not act like we made no effort to address the OL this off-season through FA. We spoke to Winston, Bell, Mathis. Sucks that they didn't come, sure but it wasn't for lack of trying. Many factors, including the salary cap penalty hurt us. And you could say well we shouldn't added Morgan and Garcon. Well then what do you do, sit around, hope an OT signs with you, and when he doesn't you just assume WRs are there?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 11:58 PM   #11
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Bringing Cousins into the discussion just confuses the discussion with peoples knee jerk desire to defend the Cousins pick so I'm not gonna comment on it.
But, with Jammal Brown's level of play, injury and missed starts an argument could be made that addressing the RT position should have been a higher priority.
I like profootball focus metrics and Jammal Brown had a terrible rating. (-18)
According to PFF Tyler was better then Brown but not by much (-16), but at least Tyler is young and you expect him to improve with playing time and maybe he develops into a league average RT?

But, right now that's just a hope.
And if Tyler is gonna be a starter then where is our quality depth?

Imo finding a more certain solution to the RT situation should have been a much higher priority.
I don't think there can be any reasonable argument made backup QB was a greater need than RT starter/depth for what it's worth. The debate of WR vs RT is a good one; however, I come down solidly on the oline side of the debate, particularly when it's a rookie QB expected to be our superstar. In that respect, the risk, calculated or not, our FA took by neglecting the RT position is pretty shocking...something I'd expect from the 1st time HC like Zorn.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 08:55 PM   #12
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I've never really understood the "I don't know if there were any good linemen at that point in the draft, but we should have taken one anyway" argument
Honestly SS unless guys here are scouts or members of the team, how would any of us really know who fits and what they want out of a player or even who they are targeting as a need? It's football and I don't have enough time with a family, work, and school to tell you who is good to draft in the fourth round.

Basically right now I like the Cousins pick. They tried to fill a need on this team. A decent backup qb was a need and found a guy in cousins who they felt filled the need.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 07:31 PM   #13
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

the sky isn't falling, but there is reason to be concerned. our OL isn't super to begin with, and striking a couple starters isn't helpful.

There just wasn't much at OT this year. OTs and CBs will be available next year, which bruce allen has already talked about.
That Guy is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 07:35 PM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Well in some good news it sounds like TW is having a strong camp.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 07:54 PM   #15
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Well in some good news it sounds like TW is having a strong camp.
Yeah, you gotta like the part where Shanny said that TW is more focused than he's ever been. That doesn't seem like ordinary coach-speak.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.67482 seconds with 11 queries