![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
There may not have been. People are hoping a six round pick in Compton is the answer. The grass is always greener though when it comes to a pick you think the team should have made instead of the one they did.
__________________
Just win. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
I've never really understood the "I don't know if there were any good linemen at that point in the draft, but we should have taken one anyway" argument
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
This is completely on Shanny and Bruce. Ive been relatively easy on and supportive of both, but I think its a bit naive to depend on Willie Smith as plan B for a RT who hasn't performed the entire time in the B&G. I dunno, is that an unreasonable view? I'm hoping for the best and by no means think this is the end of season, but jeez its a lil perplexing we wouldn't a have a better plan RT at this point.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
I guess I just don't see the big deal considering we were down 3 starters last year for the last month or so, and the line played arguably their best ball of the season during that stretch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
But, there were good OL prospects. Whether or not they become good lineman remains to be seen like with any prospect at any position. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
However, that OT could've been just as promising depth-wise as Cousins is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
And probably more likely to play for us. Not knocking the pick we made... if we didn't think anyone could contribute more to the team then fine.
__________________
http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 624
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
But, with Jammal Brown's level of play, injury and missed starts an argument could be made that addressing the RT position should have been a higher priority. I like profootball focus metrics and Jammal Brown had a terrible rating. (-18) According to PFF Tyler was better then Brown but not by much (-16), but at least Tyler is young and you expect him to improve with playing time and maybe he develops into a league average RT? But, right now that's just a hope. And if Tyler is gonna be a starter then where is our quality depth? Imo finding a more certain solution to the RT situation should have been a much higher priority. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
We have had a lot of areas to address over the past two years: needed a franchise caliber LT-drafted Williams; needed to upgrade at WR-drafted Hankerson, signed Garcon and Morgan; needed youth at RB-drafted Helu and Royster; needed help for Orakpo-drafted Kerrigan; needed a franchise QB for the next 15 years (hopefully)-drafted RG3; needed to shore up the offensive interior-signed Kory L. (funny how so many are mourning his injury when just two years ago they thought he was a bum), signed Chester, drafted LeRibeus and Gettis...and so on. And let's not act like we made no effort to address the OL this off-season through FA. We spoke to Winston, Bell, Mathis. Sucks that they didn't come, sure but it wasn't for lack of trying. Many factors, including the salary cap penalty hurt us. And you could say well we shouldn't added Morgan and Garcon. Well then what do you do, sit around, hope an OT signs with you, and when he doesn't you just assume WRs are there?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
Basically right now I like the Cousins pick. They tried to fill a need on this team. A decent backup qb was a need and found a guy in cousins who they felt filled the need.
__________________
Just win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
the sky isn't falling, but there is reason to be concerned. our OL isn't super to begin with, and striking a couple starters isn't helpful.
There just wasn't much at OT this year. OTs and CBs will be available next year, which bruce allen has already talked about. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Well in some good news it sounds like TW is having a strong camp.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Yeah, you gotta like the part where Shanny said that TW is more focused than he's ever been. That doesn't seem like ordinary coach-speak.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|