2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)

12thMan · 08-16-2012, 03:29 PM

Fair point and a distinction I didn't bother to make again, because it's been pointed out here before. The simply reality is Obama's not the boogeyman big gov't spender the right makes him out to be. Even if you consider the stimulus, 40% of were tax cuts. So again, it's a big fail when the drag that into the argument.

NC_Skins · 08-16-2012, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12thMan

Fair point and a distinction I didn't bother to make again, because it's been pointed out here before.

Yeah, it's been pointed out many times by you and me, but the same crew keeps claiming the wrong stat in regards to that particular fact. Seems that "lowest percentage of increased spending" is obviously the same as "total overall spending".

08-16-2012, 03:29 PM	#1
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,460	Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition) Fair point and a distinction I didn't bother to make again, because it's been pointed out here before. The simply reality is Obama's not the boogeyman big gov't spender the right makes him out to be. Even if you consider the stimulus, 40% of were tax cuts. So again, it's a big fail when the drag that into the argument.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)

Debating with the enemy