Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

[CrustyRedskin]

Originally Posted by aircoryell

Points are empty? Please enlighten me!

Im not much on stats but rather the product on the field, congratulations you've scored points vs Saints (22D), Rams(31D) and Cinci (32D). You are what your record says you are. 1-2 .

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by CrustyRedskin

Im not much on stats but rather the product on the field, congratulations you've scored points vs Saints (22D), Rams(31D) and Cinci (32D). You are what your record says you are. 1-2 .

And last year we scored:
0 v. Bills (30D)
13 v. Panthers (27D)
17 v. Rams (26D)

All losses.

We are 1-2, one game out of the lead in our division and two games behind the team with the best record in the NFL.

If you don't see the improvement in and potential wins due to point production, fine.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

And last year we scored:
0 v. Bills (30D)
13 v. Panthers (27D)
17 v. Rams (26D)

All losses.

We are 1-2, one game out of the lead in our division and two games behind the team with the best record in the NFL.

If you don't see the improvement in and potential wins due to point production, fine.

but but last year we were 3 - 0.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

but but last year we were 3 - 0.

Ohhhh snap!

[Jordan Shipley Whiteskin]

Hi . This is Jordan Shipley.

Being from Texas I saw plenty of RGIII at Baylor and I can tell you that he's a bum.

I signed with Tampa as soon as I saw the Redskins were on the schedule.

Have you guys seen me return kicks lately ? ....I'm a beast . I might have muffed a kick last week but don't let that fool you . I want my film to look bad so I can own the Redskins .

[aircoryell]

Originally Posted by CrustyRedskin

Im not much on stats but rather the product on the field, congratulations you've scored points vs Saints (22D), Rams(31D) and Cinci (32D). You are what your record says you are. 1-2 .

The original statement you answered "empty stats" to was about the offense. You're either suggesting the offense is to fault for the last two losses or who the opponent is, or you've completely changed your argument.

[CrustyRedskin]

Originally Posted by aircoryell

The original statement you answered "empty stats" to was about the offense. You're either suggesting the offense is to fault for the last two losses or who the opponent is, or you've completely changed your argument.

I apologize if it seemed i was singling out the O for the last two, it has by far been a team effort. Skins havnt looked good the last two weeks, team discipline, oline, defense, secondary special teams, pick one. Could care less about stats Skins are 1-2.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by CrustyRedskin

Im not much on stats but rather the product on the field, congratulations you've scored points vs Saints (22D), Rams(31D) and Cinci (32D). You are what your record says you are. 1-2 .

You've changed an argument about the offense only into an argument which includes defense and special teams. But this particular discussion is about the offense alone.

I thought that the offense started much too slowly against Cinci. Yet we still lead the NFL in scoring and are doing quite well scoring points even if we leave out defensive scores.

I agree with those folks who are excited about the offense. We have an offense which is fun to watch. When in the heck have we been in a position to say that? IMO appreciation of our current team begins with appreciation for having an offense which makes people around the NFL world talk in a good way.