Redskins vs Bucs Post Game Reaction

[Skinzman]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

This isn't really halls fault but our safeties have no range in coverage whatsoever. But today neither Hall nor Wilson could cover very much. Not one person in our secondary had a good game today.

Im not going to say he was great every play, but you cant get better coverage on some of those than he had today. That one throw by Freeman was perfect, just barely out of reach of Halls outstretched arm, and TJax still had to reach for it himself. A perfect pass will not be stopped by Revis and Ed Reed in double coverage.

As for Range in coverage, 2 deep already has them deep and if they only see one receiver going deep to their side, its an easy read to get there. And since our pass coverage took 5-7 seconds for our rush, the secondary should have given up 400 yards through the air. You do know our defense has 11 players, not 4.

[44Deezel]

Originally Posted by Skinzman

Im not going to say he was great every play, but you cant get better coverage on some of those than he had today. That one throw by Freeman was perfect, just barely out of reach of Halls outstretched arm, and TJax still had to reach for it himself. A perfect pass will not be stopped by Revis and Ed Reed in double coverage.

As for Range in coverage, 2 deep already has them deep and if they only see one receiver going deep to their side, its an easy read to get there. And since our pass coverage took 5-7 seconds for our rush, the secondary should have given up 400 yards through the air. You do know our defense has 11 players, not 4.

The word separation gets over-used. In the NFL, it's about finding single coverage and putting the ball where the receiver can make a play. D-Hall had good coverage, but receivers in single coverage should win most of the time if the ball is thrown well. Any corner would have been toast on that play.

Hankerson had a similar play but mis-timed his jump, barely got off the ground and looked ridiculous trying to make the catch. A lot of receivers would have at least made a better play on the ball. The good ones would have made the catch.

[Skinzman]

Originally Posted by 44Deezel

The word separation gets over-used. In the NFL, it's about finding single coverage and putting the ball where the receiver can make a play. D-Hall had good coverage, but receivers in single coverage should win most of the time if the ball is thrown well. Any corner would have been toast on that play.

Hankerson had a similar play but mis-timed his jump, barely got off the ground and looked ridiculous trying to make the catch. A lot of receivers would have at least made a better play on the ball. The good ones would have made the catch.

Yeah I saw that from Hank. It was late on that long pass where the announcers were saying they should be running to take time off the clock. Hank slowed down to try and undercut the CB then out jump him. Had he kept running, thats probably a complete pass since he came up several yards short. And yeah, he looked pretty bad on that one, terrible adjustment to the ball in the air.

[HTTR]

Originally Posted by 44Deezel

Hankerson had a similar play but mis-timed his jump, barely got off the ground and looked ridiculous trying to make the catch. A lot of receivers would have at least made a better play on the ball. The good ones would have made the catch.

I'm glad someone else noticed this. Both Hank and Niles Paul have the ability to make it look as though Griff just threw a slightly "off" pass, when the fact is that they don't have a knack for finding the ball and grabbing it.

Speaking of WRs, is Garcon really a douche? I was liking the fact that the Shans had gotten rid of our knuckleheads, and then along comes this BS. Seriously, what's his rep in the league?