Around the NFL...Week 12 Style

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by htownskinfan

I think there should be a penalty,but that shouldn't stop the play from being reviewable

What is the rationale for it being a penalty?

[htownskinfan]

[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;966569]What is the rationale for it being a penalty?[/QUOTE
Cmon man,its very rational.If your out of challenges and you throw the flag,theres a penalty.If you call 2 timeouts in a row to ice the kicker,its a penalty{gibbs}
Coaches should know the rules and act accordingly.I think it was Mike Pierra who said the same thing as me during the skins game,should be a penalty but it should still be reviewed

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by htownskinfan

Cmon man,its very rational.If your out of challenges and you throw the flag,theres a penalty.If you call 2 timeouts in a row to ice the kicker,its a penalty{gibbs}
Coaches should know the rules and act accordingly.I think it was Mike Pierra who said the same thing as me during the skins game,should be a penalty but it should still be reviewed

I don't know, Think about it this way - If a coach throws a challenge, and the play isn't a reviewable play, the ref will come over and talk to him, explain why it isn't and the challenge flag is picked up, no penalty. But if the play is an automatic review (which was put in so that coaches wouldn't be forced to use challenges) the ref can't just come over and say, coach we are reviewing it, and pick up the flag? Very crazy in my mind.