Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Chris Cooley

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2012, 05:45 PM   #1
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
Re: Chris Cooley

REDSKINS4ever, you need to take your emotion out of the conversation. You are such a big Cooley fan that it clouds your judgement of him.
You and GOAT are so caught up with TE being a receiver that you lose sight that the main reason Shanahan has Paulsen and Paul in there instead of Cooley is because they are winning and Paulsen & Paul are good blockers and pass protectors. If it ain't broke don't fix it. Ever heard of that?
It is no coincidence that our offense changed and in turn solidified when Fred Davis and Cooley (not known for their blocking) were either injured or cut.
You guys really underestimate the value of good run blocking TE's in THIS offense even if they are not pass catchers. Up to know we have had enough production through the ground game and RGIII and our WR's, that we can win with out our TE's being heavily involved in the passing attack.
If it works why change it?
Defensewins is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 05:49 PM   #2
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
REDSKINS4ever, you need to take your emotion out of the conversation. You are such a big Cooley fan that it clouds your judgement of him.
You and GOAT are so caught up with TE being a receiver that you lose sight that the main reason Shanahan has Paulsen and Paul in there instead of Cooley is because they are winning and Paulsen & Paul are good blockers and pass protectors. If it ain't broke don't fix it. Ever heard of that?
It is no coincidence that our offense changed and in turn solidified when Fred Davis and Cooley (not known for their blocking) were either injured or cut.
You guys really underestimate the value of good run blocking TE's in THIS offense even if they are not pass catchers. Up to know we have had enough production through the ground game and RGIII and our WR's, that we can win with out our TE's being heavily involved in the passing attack.
If it works why change it?
I give up. Sure, Paul is a good blocker, even though he doesn't do it on gameday. He's also an all pro pass catcher, a fulbright scholar, and a superb chef.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 05:51 PM   #3
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
I give up. Sure, Paul is a good blocker, even though he doesn't do it on gameday. He's also an all pro pass catcher, a fulbright scholar, and a superb chef.
And Cooley is a probowl players and teams were fighting over him when we cut him.
Defensewins is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:01 PM   #4
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
And Cooley is a probowl players and teams were fighting over him when we cut him.
Correction: Cooley was a probowl player who had his best season in 2010 with Mike Shanahan and he said after being released he preferred to stay in DC to live and play for the Skins again.

See how those darn facts make it so much different than the nonsense you wrote?
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:10 PM   #5
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Correction: Cooley was a probowl player who had his best season in 2010 with Mike Shanahan and he said after being released he preferred to stay in DC to live and play for the Skins again.

See how those darn facts make it so much different than the nonsense you wrote?
How? Please explain.
FRPLG is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:08 PM   #6
SkinsGuru
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsGuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
And Cooley is a probowl players and teams were fighting over him when we cut him.
i read that Cooley turned down quite a few offers, to start even, telling teams if he was going to play again if would be for the Redskins and no one else . . .
SkinsGuru is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:11 PM   #7
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsGuru View Post
i read that Cooley turned down quite a few offers, to start even, telling teams if he was going to play again if would be for the Redskins and no one else . . .
Citation?
FRPLG is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:12 PM   #8
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Citation?
Chris Cooley Believes He Can Help Redskins as Soon as Sunday « CBS DC
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 06:14 PM   #9
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Chris Cooley

So Cooley said this. Ok. In any case he doesn't seem to be able to unseat either guy he originally got cut for. That should tell us something.
FRPLG is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 07:02 PM   #10
SkinsGuru
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsGuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 736
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Citation?
??? Citation ??? i work for Citation Technologies (Citation Technologies Inc. | Regulatory Compliance Software) if that is what you are asking??
SkinsGuru is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 07:03 PM   #11
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsGuru View Post
??? Citation ??? i work for Citation Technologies (Citation Technologies Inc. | Regulatory Compliance Software) if that is what you are asking??
Are YOU holding CC back too?
FRPLG is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 05:52 PM   #12
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
Re: Chris Cooley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
REDSKINS4ever, you need to take your emotion out of the conversation. You are such a big Cooley fan that it clouds your judgement of him.

You and GOAT are so caught up with TE being a receiver that you lose sight that the main reason Shanahan has Paulsen and Paul in there instead of Cooley is because they are winning and Paulsen & Paul are good blockers and pass protectors. If it ain't broke don't fix it. Ever heard of that?

It is no coincidence that our offense changed and in turn solidified when Fred Davis and Cooley (not known for their blocking) were either injured or cut.
You guys really underestimate the value of good run blocking TE's in THIS offense even if they are not pass catchers. Up to know we have had enough production through the ground game and RGIII and our WR's, that we can win with out our TE's being heavily involved in the passing attack.
If it works why change it?
Paulsen is good at blocking and passing. Paul, not so much. While Cooley may not be back (I hope he does), Fred Davis will be back next season.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.58091 seconds with 11 queries