Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
And as you know from the links that I provided, the study by Lee and Suardi has been refuted.
Any more discredited research that you guys would like to cite, since you are 0 for 2 so far in providing substantive research which supports your position?
|
There is no mention of Lee and/or Suardi or their work in the first link and the second makes some vague rebuttal that there may have been a lag between the implementation and the effect.
However it does make this comment you obviously overlooked:
It does not appear that the Australian experience with gun buybacks is fully replicable in the United States. Levitt provides three reasons why gun buybacks in the United States have apparently been ineffective: (a) the buybacks are relatively small in scale (b) guns are surrendered voluntarily, and so are not like the ones used in crime; and (c) replacement guns are easy to obtain.
Once again you try to bluster or bluff your way through an argument you can't validate.