![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#5 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,574
|
Re: Thoughts on the game
one int was a disgustingly bad decision by ramsey, the other was an overthrow that could have hit moss, but the window was so small that i'd call it a pretty bad decision too.
rock's failing on 4th and 2 was the o-lines fault, rock still looks good though, nemo did too beside the fumble... hell, bessides the ints ramsey looked good too :P 2 passes into tight spaces, completionss of 25(td), 30, 33, 46 yards... his feet weren't doing the happy dance like last game and he didn't stare down receivers (that i noticed, on the td he looked off thrash to open him up... good play). The stare own thing is something ramsey's typically been bad at throughout his short career. the bomb tossed on rodgers happened because he was exhausted (and it was very obvious)... now that he'll be doing full conditioning and practices that shouldn't happen again. I'm convinced we're 4 deep at RB... I see no problems with our game there, oline has looked better, rbs have looked really good (until combs comes in... that guy has to go. He dropped a massive turd last week and followed it up with another bad showing). Hopefully we can keep both of them. Boschetti is our 4th DT, I don't think there's really much of a competition there anymore... no real 1st team penalties... wilds looked good and better than rufus brown or AJ have so far, I think he'll be a good #4. ST also went man coverage on a top3 WR again and won... maybe he could be a cb in emergencies since we have more starters at safety. I rather have taylor, clark, bowen/preilou then AJ, taylor, clark ![]() brown is a GOOD returner. He didn't break anything big, but no fair catches and always got above average yardage. meanwhile our coverage team was solid again; thrash has to be the best gunner ever ![]() We didn't dump off behind the 1st down markers this game, the scheme looked legit, bombs, outside runs, etc... I don't think we have to worry about a repeat of 2004 for now. overall i think this was a good step up... besides ramsey (on again, off again) everyone looked pretty good (minus some scrubs). One thing i did mention in the chat was ramsey threw 2.5times per rush (20 to 8) and brunell threw 1.7 per (19 to 11) which helped brunell pass a bit easier early on (5/6 play his first drive were runs and cinci wasn't expecting it). That in no way excuses the ints or anything, just thought it was interesting. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|