Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Moss, Patten, and...

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: #3 Receiver on Opening Day
Brown 5 5.62%
Dyson 9 10.11%
Jacobs 12 13.48%
McCants 5 5.62%
Thrash 58 65.17%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2005, 01:18 AM   #1
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,427
Re: Moss, Patten, and...

most likely thrash, but i would liek to see either mccants or brown get the playing time.
but thrashes experience will give him the edge.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2005, 01:30 AM   #2
manicd
Special Teams
 
manicd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 155
Re: Moss, Patten, and...

Gotta go with Thrash too. None of the other guys showed enough yet. Also, with Thrash and Patten, we actually have guys that can hold on to the damn ball. Nice change from all the drops we were so accustomed to.
manicd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2005, 02:45 AM   #3
dblanch66
The Starter
 
dblanch66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 60
Posts: 1,176
Re: Moss, Patten, and...

Gotta go with Thrash. He earns it playing special teams too and he has reliable hands and fights for yardage. I like Dyson, too however, due to his size and I think he and Cooley will be a nice package in the red zone.
dblanch66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.79869 seconds with 12 queries