![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Official Redskins Free Agency Thread 2013
Bruce Allen says "we did violate any rule or regulation. We were never warned." #Redskins
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
|
Re: Official Redskins Free Agency Thread 2013
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Official Redskins Free Agency Thread 2013
Quote:
I think the FO is managing our situation damned well, assuming RT and FS performance improve over last year.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Official Redskins Free Agency Thread 2013
Quote:
Secondly, I think they're already improved at RT over last year, assuming you mean marginally improved. Whether or not they re-sign Polumbus as the backup or just give the swing man role to Maurice Hurt, the idea is that Tom Compton is going to have to win the job at RT. I don't agree with skimping at the right tackle position, but knowing that our lack of resources are going to create a deficiency in at least one area of the team because of limited salary cap space and draft picks, I understand a Tony Pashos/Tom Compton camp battle to be a starting tackle (loser misses the roster). It's just imperative now that we take our two day 2 draft picks and enough salary cap space to sign about two quality free agents, and fill the three remaining holes (TE, CB, S). To be honest though, if Davis re-signs, they should be able to address all three in free agency, and in position to just draft the best player available.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|