Official Redskins Free Agency Thread 2013 Part II

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

We'll bring back hall, it's basically a given at this point. He wants to stay in Washington

It would be pretty stupid to have both Hall and Biggers. Biggers is like DeAngelo Hall, but without the upside (ie paymaking ability).

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

It would be pretty stupid to have both Hall and Biggers. Biggers is like DeAngelo Hall, but without the upside (ie paymaking ability).

What if Hall is being brought back as a FS first and a situational corner?

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

What if Hall is being brought back as a FS first and a situational corner?

Boom! But we'll still need a starting corner in this scenario, be it via FA or draft.

[SkinzzFan]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

It would be pretty stupid to have both Hall and Biggers. Biggers is like DeAngelo Hall, but without the upside (ie paymaking ability).

Why would it be stupid to have both? The one with upside starts and the other, who you claim is similar but not quite as good, would simply be depth in case of an injury. Most backups in the league possess a similar skill set as their starter, but are without the "upside" or they themselves would start, right? If we can afford both (a funny thing to say given our cap situation) why not have them both?