![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 1,022
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
This was The Eagles in their finest hour.Thats all it was. Did we get our ass kicked? Yes. will this happen again to us? No, it was a once in a lifetime game. I will not give up on us, we still have 3 division games left.
__________________
"Not only do you get a 1st down, but you get a whole new set of downs" John Madden |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
I'm with you
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
most of us were loving the D when they were getting all those turnovers.
im confused, to be honest this year it is hard for me to see what adjustments we make in game on the d side of the ball. its just hard to tell what kind of D we are playing on any given play watching on the tv.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
Yeah it looked like we did jack **** during the bye week.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
Points From Turnovers
Before the bye, Washington had approximately 9 INTs and 9 Fumbles Recovered for a total of 18 Takeaways. Since two of those takeaways ended the game (or the Redskins ran out the clock), let's say 16 true take aways. From 16 Takeaways, the Redskins got 4 TDs and 3 FGs.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
By the way did anyone else see TO's tweet about Donovan's contract?
T.O. claims his brother posted the anti-Donovan Twitter message | ProFootballTalk Or his brother's tweet, as TO claimed Donovan had a good response though. Bengals are 2-7, or something like that, so who's he to talk
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
Quote:
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
Y would you steal my avatar
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
Thats the beauty of the parrot. People have to go out of their way to steal your avatar.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
I'm still reppin Pineapple Jesus till the day the site shuts down. (if that ever happens)
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Serenity Now
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
The Eagles would have beaten any team in the NFL by at least 10 points last night IMO. Vick was that good, it was QB perfection. In fact if someone can find a video of a bad play he made last night I'd love to see it cuz I don't remember a single one. That being said...
Sorry to but I can't help but question the 3-4 again. I think 90% here agree the current roster is much better suited for the 4-3. I just picture a DL of Carter, Orakpo, LoAx, and a MOTIVATED AH. Plus the first three guys are athletic enough that we could use a lot of "exotic looks" with the DLs dropping back into coverage etc.Another problem I see with the 3-4 is its complexity. I'm no X O expert but what I like about the 3-4 is all the different looks you can show at the line. It can make things very confusing for the opposing offense. The flip side is that it can also be confusing for the defense. Guys are switching positions and assignments from play to play and you really need some cerebral guys out there who know what the hell is going on, otherwise a good offense will make you run around like chickens. Unfortunately Fletcher is the only guy with a brain on this D (maybe Rak and Los too), and Hall and Landry ain't winning a Nobel Prize in physics anytime soon. Maybe it just takes time/players like others keep saying (I sure hope so). But couldn't we have started with a 4-3 and transitioned to a 3-4 as the right players were added? Plus where are we getting all these players from? We need 4 OLs at least! Whatever... rant over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
I don't think TO's or Moss' teams lost the SB because they were locker room cancers. Honestly, AH being a so called "cancer" is the least of our team's concern right now.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 1,022
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
Quote:
__________________
"Not only do you get a 1st down, but you get a whole new set of downs" John Madden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: LOL @ Redskins
Haynesworth. I like the guy. He's as valuable asset. But... Last night....
Just pointing something out and I dunno if anyone else heard/saw this... Trevor Maitich commented on the post-game that the play where Vick had 8 seconds to run around in the pocket near our goal line Haynesworth made penetration into the pocket, fell on his face... and stayed there, while Orakpo is busting his balls trying to get away from the o-lineman and get to Vick. I don't know if anyone actually saw that on the replay but if that's any sign to the type of effort the Skins were putting into the Monday night game... That's absolutely friggin inexcusable.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|