![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Can this shitty team do anything right? We're not going to the playoffs. What was the use of winning that game?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
I don't care for a number 1 receiver not named Johnson or Fitzgerald. Packers have a bunch of number 2 receivers and have flourished due to their QB play.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
skins will finish 6-10 IMO and have the 9th pick
Beat NYJ and MIN
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
I gotcha SB, and I'd give SD our 2nd rounder for Rivers
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
The only way the Redskins get Barkley in this senario is to trade up and it will cost next years number one at the minimum. The Browns have the advantage of having two number one's, in this upcoming draft.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
A good (stats heavy) one from FO's Vince Verhei. ESPN Insider required:
With the makings of a solid D, Washington needs to find playmakers on offense - NFL - ESPN
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Remember last year when we thought Newton would definitely fall to 10? Yeah I'm starting to get skeptical of these guys that say Barkley will be around at 8. Lets just assume he's going around 2 or 3 via trade.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
I think Barkley, Griffin, and Luck will all be gone by the sixth pick even if they call come out. It's very much worth looking at other names if we pick outside of the top six or seven. If you want to make a youtube cut-up of Nick Foles someday, I think people would be shocked at how good of a player he is compared to other guys like Tannehill, Cousins, Lindley, Jones etc. The way people talk about him as a late round pick, you wouldn't think he could make any throw with any amount of pressure on him. Except that he can. The other thing I like about Foles is how he uses his feet effectively. He's got Tom Brady's athleticism (or lack of), but still moves effectively. And while this may be an effect of his offense, he managed to be one of the toughest players to sack in college football (and one of the ten best passers) despite crappy receivers and two freshman tackles who couldn't block anything. Assuming the top guys are gone, I would just sit tight and take Foles with the first round pick, wherever that may be in the round.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. Last edited by GTripp0012; 11-29-2011 at 03:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
I'd put him with the top tier guys. I'd probably go with Luck, then Griffin, then Barkley, then Foles, all top ten picks.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
BTW, I think your assessments of Landry and Cousins are right on the mark. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
That's what I meant. Luck, Barkley, RGIII are sure prospects, Foles is in my opinion some experts disagree. I thought you said he wouldn't be drafted till around the 5th round?
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|