Jabar Gaffney Told to Seek A Trade

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

As I understand, cutting Moss save us about $1.5 million whereas cutting Gaffney would be around $2.5 million.

If we cut Moss in July, we save a lot more.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

If we cut Moss in July, we save a lot more.

Hmmm. Thought I heard otherwise. But regardless I really can't see us cutting him. Garcon, regardless of the hype, can't be expected to contribute consistently. Hank and Morgan are ? with injury status. And Moss knows the system better than anyone.

...that said Tana needs to step up this season.

[los panda]

why would a trade be mentioned if he wasn't under contract?

[donofriose]

I think the league knows we are probably just going to eventually cut him. So probably no trade

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

A 12 page thread on a player who was asked to look for a trade.

Wow we need something new to dwell on.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07

A 12 page thread on a player who was asked to look for a trade.

Wow we need something new to dwell on.

Don't worry, I am just about to start a new thread comparing Luck's draft reactions to Griffins, and then expound on the need for OL. I got your back!

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Don't worry, I am just about to start a new thread comparing Luck's draft reactions to Griffins, and then expound on the need for OL. I got your back!

But, but, but, I thought we had seen the last of the Luck/Griffin thread...according to one thread.

LOL.

[SmootSmack]

Yeah a post June 1 cut does save more money (cutting Moss that is), but I think it's just a difference of a $100k or so, between cutting Moss post June 1 and cutting Gaffney (at any time)

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by The Goat

Hmmm. Thought I heard otherwise. But regardless I really can't see us cutting him. Garcon, regardless of the hype, can't be expected to contribute consistently. Hank and Morgan are ? with injury status. And Moss knows the system better than anyone.



...that said Tana needs to step up this season.

Why can't Garcon be counted on to produce consistent.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Why can't Garcon be counted on to produce consistent.

Pierre Garcon, WR for the Washington Redskins at NFL.com

Considering he had arguably the greatest QB of all-time throwing to him till last year, when he became the primary WR target for most of the season, I would call those pretty pedestrian numbers. Oh and he's a bit of a fumbler, especially for a WR.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by The Goat

Pierre Garcon, WR for the Washington Redskins at NFL.com

Considering he had arguably the greatest QB of all-time throwing to him till last year, when he became the primary WR target for most of the season, I would call those pretty pedestrian numbers. Oh and he's a bit of a fumbler, especially for a WR.

You have to consider Manning has always spread the ball around pretty well aside from his main target Reggie Wayne. In 2010 for example, Wayne 111 catches, Tamme 67, Garcon 67, Collie 58.

3 fumbles in 4 seasons and he's a fumbler?

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

You have to consider Manning has always spread the ball around pretty well aside from his main target Reggie Wayne. In 2010 for example, Wayne 111 catches, Tamme 67, Garcon 67, Collie 58.

3 fumbles in 4 seasons and he's a fumbler?

For comparison Gaffney has the same number of fumbles in 10 seasons. But more importantly Garcon fumbled twice last season and lost both...that's inexcusable for a WR and especially for one who didn't even break 1000 yards.

Your point on Wayne is a good one though, he was a legit #1 for Manning unlike Garcon.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by The Goat

For comparison Gaffney has the same number of fumbles in 10 seasons. But more importantly Garcon fumbled twice last season and lost both...that's inexcusable for a WR and especially for one who didn't even break 1000 yards.

Your point on Wayne is a good one though, he was a legit #1 for Manning unlike Garcon.

So the rationale is if you're a wide receiver and you fumble twice, but still have over 1000 yards, it's all good? I'd worry about it if it became a trend, not a one-year anomaly.

[REDSKINS4ever]

Garcon should be able to produce. With Hankerson, Morgan, and Moss, the Redskins passing/receiving game should be very sharp.

[Drewsky27]

I heard on nfl network RGIII will wear number ten. Anyone know if thats official?