![]() |
|
|||||||
| Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Quote:
Regardless of which idiot wins this time around, "did you support obama?" ought to be an effective rebuttal to any democrat who wants to complain about negative campaigning the next 50 years. Last edited by HailGreen28; 07-27-2012 at 04:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
So awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
I think well hear more about Churchill's bust pretty soon. But i think the issue is that it was removed from the Oval Office, not that it was sent back to GB. Back in 2009:
A British Embassy spokesman said: "The bust of Sir Winston Churchill by Sir Jacob Epstein was uniquely lent to a foreign head of state, President George W Bush, from the Government Art Collection in the wake of 9/11 as a signal of the strong transatlantic relationship. "It was lent for the first term of office of President Bush. When the President was elected for his second and final term, the loan was extended until January 2009. "The new President has decided not to continue this loan and the bust has now been returned. It is on display at the Ambassador's Residence." Barack Obama sends bust of Winston Churchill on its way back to Britain - Telegraph Romney's actual (meaning real) remarks: "I'm looking forward to the bust of Winston Churchill being in the Oval Office again," Romney promises to bring Churchill bust back to White House - Political Hotsheet - CBS News Maybe by placing it with the diplomat it becomes technically held by the foreign country the said diplomat represents?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
It's really not that serious to begin with, I only raised it because Monkeyday made hay about it.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
It really isn't...Given that bust space is limited I do think that busts of great Americans belong in the Oval Office more so than that of any other foreign figures.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
My understanding is that the bust has not been returned or given back to the ambassador. It was simply relocated from the Oval Office to another location in the White House in favor of Abe's bust.
The whole story about it being returned or what have you originated from National Journal and it seems that the media neglected to fact check NJ's claims. Also, Romney could very well have been just saying that he would relocate Churchill's bust back to the Oval Office...hopefully not in favor of Abe's bust.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins Last edited by saden1; 07-27-2012 at 03:10 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Quote:
You know im pretty interested in what the real story is now. I too was under the impression that the Bust left the White House. Interestingly the WH Fact Check never makes any direct mention of the Bust leaving the White House, just that it is in the WH and has been since at least July 20th of 2010. But it does say Krauthammer is 100% lieing and Krauthammer implies it left the WH. Also Krauthammer never says the Bust isnt currently in the WH, just that Obama removed the bust from the Oval Office and returned it to the British Embassy. Which is either partially or completely true. Meanwhile the British Embassy spokesperson said in Feburary 2009 that the bust had indeed been returned to them and is "on display at Ambassador's Residence". To me this sounds like because of all the heat the President took by returning the Bust he brought it back. And it appears he brought back quitely. Either way either The WH Fact Check or the British Embassy lied. However Krauthammer didnt, as he was either mistaken (like all of us) or right. And Romney, in what im thinking was in a completely acidental way, said nothing that could be viewed as incorrect by any means.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
You're missing the point.
The inference by Krauthammer and other right wing loons was that President Obama slighted the Brits by shipping the bust back to Britain. Whether it was moved 10 blocks up the street to the Embassy and later back to the White House is immaterial and entirely besides the point. It's in the White House and Obama rightly gave deference to Lincoln over Churchill The narrative is what's important here; that Obama slighted the Brits, lacked judgement and diplomacy. That lie has been perpetuated for three years and now has been proven patently false. That's the point. I'm done with this thread. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
I completely agree that Lincoln bust should be in the office over Churchill's. But youre completely mistaken if you think that if Obama gave the bust back to the Brits is somehow immaterial or besides the point. And how in any way has the narrative that Obama slighted the Brits been proven "patently false"? If Obama took the statue back because he realized he slighted the Brits it kind feel the "lie" isnt all that much of a lie.
I just find this whole thing curious because like everyone else i was under the impression that Obama slighted the Brits by giving the bust back. So did he? Did the bust leave the whitehouse? Why did it come back? Will Kelly go to the dance with Zack?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Quote:
![]() The Brits love Obama. I hate to put it in those terms because he's a head of state not a celebrity, but it's true. I think that accurately captures the sentiment abroad towards the president. I have a few friends that live across the pond and they'd tell you themselves. David Cameron and Obama were at the NCAA tourney eating dogs and yucking it up. They appear to have a close relationship. Here's a good article. "Cameron worships Obama" http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report...1719869http:// David Cameron’s special relationship with President Obama - The Washington Post So if there's anyone who's offended or feels slighted, I can assure you it's Obama's opponents in Congress. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
edit: Done with the topic
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
HG28, you're confusing us debating about a stupid bust with what Obama's talking about on the campaign trail? 'Cause he's talking about plenty issues.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
Quote:
Claiming to have to dig through campaign footage to find Obama actually talking about issues, and seeing how Obama's going almost totally negative campaigning on TV ads, speaks for itself. Doesn't it? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|