Broncos vs Skins Post Game Thread

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Bucket

Same game but sometimes that protection goes on the RB and QB.. Not saying the line is perfect but RG3 didn't do anything to help them

I think adequate would be a better choice of words than perfect....

[Bucket]

Originally Posted by punch it in

I think adequate would be a better choice of words than perfect....

The biggest issue right now and this is my opinion. Mike set this team up to run the rollouts and keep the offensive line moving like he has always done. I enjoy the offense when it plays like it should, but Kyle wants to perform 5 step drops and keep RG3 in the pocket.

It's not working..

How many boots did we see yesterday? Even when the run game was working? I only remember one and it was rolled out to the opposite side of RG3's arm.

[JLee9718]

I just don't understand the plays that were called. It seemed like our coaches felt sorry for Denver and wanted to let them score more points. I'm still shaking my head at the calls little Kyle made. Why did we ever want Kyle here in the first place? He was touted as the next Joe Gibbs (by his dad, that is!).

[skinsfan69]

Larry F. is in his 30's. Trading for him is something Vinny would've done.

[diehardskin2982]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Larry F. is in his 30's. Trading for him is something Vinny would've done.

Trading for a top 5 reciever, no matter what age he is. Getting a player of his caliber is something anyone would do.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

Trading for a top 5 reciever, no matter what age he is. Getting a player of his caliber is something anyone would do.

So you want to trade more draft picks for a wr in his 30's? If could be see we were Seattle or SF. But we're not a SB contending type of team w/ Fitz. No thanks.

[diehardskin2982]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

So you want to trade more draft picks for a wr in his 30's? If could be see we were Seattle or SF. But we're not a SB contending type of team w/ Fitz. No thanks.

The deal doesn't only have to be draft picks. Plus Fitz generation type player so yea I would do it.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

Trading for a top 5 reciever, no matter what age he is. Getting a player of his caliber is something anyone would do.

Which is what we attempted to do five years ago, when the guy's name was Ochocinco.

[diehardskin2982]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Which is what we attempted to do five years ago, when the guy's name was Ochocinco.

Fitz is a better player and better man then ocho. I'm gonna make a thread for this I won't take over this thread with my nonsense, lol.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

Fitz is a better player and better man then ocho. I'm gonna make a thread for this I won't take over this thread with my nonsense, lol.

In a nutshell, he's not really a better player now than Chad was at the time.

He might not fall off as quickly as Chad did...but he also may fall off faster.

[skinsfaninok]

no chance we get fitz

[skinsfaninok]

agree with tripp

[luvthemskins1975]

Garcon: 'If you suck at passing, you suck at passing'

Is there a beef between garcon and RG3?

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by luvthemskins1975

Garcon: 'If you suck at passing, you suck at passing'

Is there a beef between garcon and RG3?

wouldnt surprise me

[Gmanc711]

Originally Posted by luvthemskins1975

Garcon: 'If you suck at passing, you suck at passing'

Is there a beef between garcon and RG3?

The article I read regarding this (granted quickly from Bleacher Report so take it for what it's worth) is that Garcon was careful to point out that he was upset about scheme and not RG3.