![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Guilty: The Evil Blackmail Post
Quote:
The 2010 class is stronger than the 2009 class. Those commenters were correct, including yourself. But from the perspective of holding the fourth overall pick in either draft, the point is basically moot. Sanchez would have been a bad overdraft at No. 4 for Seattle, who if nothing else last year, found out they needed a QB. And I wouldn't select McCoy/Bradford at No. 4 overall this year. But as the value/salary structure begins to change later down the board, I feel way more comfortable with the quality of this class than with the 09 class. It's far from a likelyhood that you'll get a guy who is better than Campbell drafting from this class, but that's only one dimension of our QB need. The other is depth/insurance against having a contract dilemma in 2011.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,223
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
If Bradord, Shu and Okung are off the board when we draft that is a huge dagger.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Have faith my child. Bryan Buluga is a talent worthy of #4 overall.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
NFL Events: Combine Player Profiles - Trent Williams Top 5 performer in 40-yard dash | Vertical jump | Broad jump | 20-yard shuttle
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
I wouldn't mind taking Suh & then playing a lot of 4-3 w/he & AH inside, also playing 3-4 w/AH at DE. Suh could play DE in the 3-4 as well. I think the guy is too good to pass up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Big Hawkeyes fan. Love Bulaga. Wouldn't take him at 4
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Oh man, the disclaimer followed by the denial. Why the lack of faith? Is it related more towards his ability or medical history?
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
I see him as a RT in the NFL. And I don't spend a 4th overall on a RT
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
If Suh is there when we pick, we find someone to ransom him off too. As a player, he is a luxury at one of the few positions we are set. As trade bait, he is gold waiting to be cashed in.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 48
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
I wouldn't mind picking him either if we go to a 3-4. If we didn't need a whole new offensive line he and Taylor Mays would be my choice. Well at least right now.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
I don't know...I kind of prefer handing our pick card to the commissioner before he has even finished announcing the pick before ours. Who needs to use our allotted time to see if another team is interested in trading up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
After releasing Griffin, I wouldn't really say we're "set" at DT. Montgomery and Golston aren't exactly studs by any means. If we're fully committed to a switch to a 3-4, we're going to need some flux with D-lineman. I wonder how Suh would be as a 3-4 DE? My gut is that he's best suited as a 4-3 DT.
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
^ And gold is going up all the time.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
I mean the thing w/ Suh is it all depends whether he can dominate as NT in the 3-4 since we'll see it a fair bit. I sorta think back to last year w/ BJ Raji. Understandably injury held him back but in general he found it hard to adjust to the 3-4. Very hard to say if Suh would make an immediate impact.
I also doubt Haslett would stay in a 4-3 base just because we got Suh. We got awesome dline play last year, especially when Griff was 100%. Coming up we had Jarmon coming into his own possibly at LDE and Alexander progressing as a rotation lineman. Haslett is forcing the 3-4 regardless of personnel is my feeling so again everything depends about Suh's ability in the 3-4.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|